dickie davies
Well-Known Member
She has on bluemoonThat’s all well and good, but she hasn’t been tried.
She has on bluemoonThat’s all well and good, but she hasn’t been tried.
Maybe security services have offered up enough evidence against her that has given both governments that same position?
Personally I'd much rather leave her where she is than have my tax paying to keep her locked up warm fed and watered. At 15 she knew what she was doing was wrong why anybody but money grabbing lawyers are showing any concern is beyond me, leave her in peace now to live out her life in whatever shithole she picked.That is an absolutely unimpeachable point and an absolutely valid observation. The security services may well know deeply disturbing shit about her that would make a lot of people think differently.
But as things stand, in terms of the info that is in the public domain, she’s one of us who broke our laws. She can fucking well rot in a British jail until she’s served her time.
That’s all well and good until someone you may sympathise with is denied access to a fair trial.Personally I'd much rather leave her where she is than have my tax paying to keep her locked up warm fed and watered. At 15 she knew what she was doing was wrong why anybody but money grabbing lawyers are showing any concern is beyond me, leave her in peace now to live out her life in whatever shithole she picked.
I don't agree it's a slippery slope at all, someone who has the benefit of dual nationality is a threat to one Country loses the right of abode there I don't consider it a slippery slope. Different opinions obviously.That’s all well and good until someone you may sympathise with is denied access to a fair trial.
It’s a slippery slope to go down.
She doesn’t have dual nationality and she hasn’t been tried for anything.I don't agree it's a slippery slope at all, someone who has the benefit of dual nationality is a threat to one Country loses the right of abode there I don't consider it a slippery slope. Different opinions obviously.
Do you think Farage knew what he was doing when he threw antisemitic comments about when he was fifteen?Personally I'd much rather leave her where she is than have my tax paying to keep her locked up warm fed and watered. At 15 she knew what she was doing was wrong why anybody but money grabbing lawyers are showing any concern is beyond me, leave her in peace now to live out her life in whatever shithole she picked.
Leave her in peace? Fuck that.Personally I'd much rather leave her where she is than have my tax paying to keep her locked up warm fed and watered. At 15 she knew what she was doing was wrong why anybody but money grabbing lawyers are showing any concern is beyond me, leave her in peace now to live out her life in whatever shithole she picked.
It seems to be that because the government have found a loophole to revoke her citizenship, they don’t want to waste more money on her.Leave her in peace? Fuck that.
She’s a criminal. She broke our laws and she should be punished. Once she has served her time she may be rehabilitated enough to be readmitted to society.
I just don’t understand why people like you don’t want her to be punished for breaking our laws.
She holds Bangladeshi citizenship through her parents section 5 of the nationality act 1951 hope that clears that up.She doesn’t have dual nationality and she hasn’t been tried for anything.
I think being removed from the UK is punishment enough, cheaper too.Leave her in peace? Fuck that.
She’s a criminal. She broke our laws and she should be punished. Once she has served her time she may be rehabilitated enough to be readmitted to society.
I just don’t understand why people like you don’t want her to be punished for breaking our laws.
Quite probably yep, I know I would have.Do you think Farage knew what he was doing when he threw antisemitic comments about when he was fifteen?
Its also illegal to want innocent people be killed.Regardless of what you think should happen I am amazed she can have her citizenship revoked. It seems she doesn’t have Bangladeshi citizenship or any other yet the reason she can have her British citizenship revoked is because she has Bangladeshi citizenship. It’s illegal to make someone stateless
If you don't know the basic difference between right and wrong at 15, you have a problem. I knew at that age not to be giving the neighbours grief, or to getting into trouble with the police, or at school. As, I'm guessing, you did. Basic common sense. Was I a goody two shoes? Certainly not. But I like to think that I knew how far to go before I started to look like a twat.Do you think Farage knew what he was doing when he threw antisemitic comments about when he was fifteen?
She doesn’t.She holds Bangladeshi citizenship through her parents section 5 of the nationality act 1951 hope that clears that up.
As it's pantomime season oh yes she does by international law via her mother, just because Bangladesh decides to ignore international law that not the UKs fault.She doesn’t.
Bangladesh have already said that if she applied to activate it, they would reject it immediately.
As it's pantomime season oh yes she does by international law via her mother, just because Bangladesh decides to ignore international law that not the UKs fault.