And you won't "win" this by trying to portray yourself as the arbiter of reasonable discussion and then insulting people in the very same paragraph. I said assault rifle, that's true. It's irrelevant what type of gun I said, the point stands. The idea that buying a gun is a rational response to the threat of burglary and the fact that the police might take a while to come out is extremely odd. Now I accept that it is the stated reason that a lot of people own a gun, but I think they'd be far better spending that money on things that might actually help, like good quality doors and windows, burglar alarms and home insurance. All of which have the advantage of continuing to work when you're not there, which as I understand it, is the burglar's preferred time to call in. Burglars are typically adverse to houses that have people in them, and as such, if you find yourself in a house with a burglar, the sound you make needn't be that of a gun to send them fleeing. Now you might get situations where it's more of an armed robbery, which is obviously far more frightening, but again, all they want is your stuff, so it wouldn't seem like a particularly good solution to escalate that situation into a you vs. them confrontation with firearms. And obviously most countries where you can get a gun agree with this, because self-defence or home defence is not typically an accepted reason to be given a licence. There might be an argument that the widespread ownership of guns acts as a deterrent for burglars in the first place, but the statistics don't seem to back this up, with only 2 European countries having a higher rate of burglaries that the USA.