Shootings in Paris

[Anonymous]

freedom of speech is an interesting concept but however the concepts only comes up when its about mocking Muslims or their beliefs,(pbuh) or mocking islam( a religion of 2 billion people) and taking a cover of freedom of speech but my question is where does freedom of speech goes when a footballer shares a joke about jews and gets banned (balotelli) or gets banned for a mere celebration (anelka case ) or you cant talk about holacaust in europe or homophobic text etc ,
only in today's news american rapper snoop dogg is facing a lawsuit for sharing a homophabic image ?where are all the so called human rights organisation supporting freedom of speech or where were they Israel gunned down 17 journalist?accrording to one of guardian articles the same magazine fired a journalist for anti semetic article ,i fully condemn the killings and condolences to the families but mocking beliefs of 2 billion people around the world is no freedom of speech

Is that right?

And I quote "there is no difference between some radical cleric giving a hate speech and provoking people for terrorism and someone abusing or drawing up images of Prophet Mohammed"
Oh dear

I think to be fair to cip he/she is trying to say they're both provocative and exist to cause trouble.

What about the rest of his/her post, don't you see the double standards on so called freedom of speech from his/her point.?

 

[Gaylord du Bois]

what no pork humour?!

not even in cartoon form?!?!

The CoC requires you to treat other users with respect. People need to remember that there are posters on here who are Muslim and that our club's owner and his family are as well. They aren't the ones who carried out these atrocities.

Reading some of the views in the thread and concerning our ownership I am surprised some can actually in all good concience remain City fans.

I hope that there are not a lot of our supporters or even our owners reading threads like this and learning just what some of our fans think of them and their religion.

Hyperbole at its finest. I'd say five maybe six have crossed any sort of line with regard to the Muslim faith. Out of what? A near fifty thousand membership? Come on, get a grip.

 

[TCIB]

freedom of speech is an interesting concept but however the concepts only comes up when its about mocking Muslims or their beliefs,there is no difference between some radical cleric giving a hate speech and provoking people for terrorism and someone abusing or drawing up images of Prophet Mohammed (pbuh) or mocking islam( a religion of 2 billion people) and taking a cover of freedom of speech but my question is where does freedom of speech goes when a footballer shares a joke about jews and gets banned (balotelli) or gets banned for a mere celebration (anelka case ) or you cant talk about holacaust in europe or homophobic text etc ,
only in today's news american rapper snoop dogg is facing a lawsuit for sharing a homophabic image ?where are all the so called human rights organisation supporting freedom of speech or where were they Israel gunned down 17 journalist?accrording to one of guardian articles the same magazine fired a journalist for anti semetic article ,i fully condemn the killings and condolences to the families but mocking beliefs of 2 billion people around the world is no freedom of speech

freedom of speech also allows the mocking of everyone in the world including christian muppets and jewish arseholes and of course buddhist coonts and hindu wankers etc etc etc etc

the news probably just fails to report the extremists of those equally pointless religions murdering innocent people

It is a shame the BBC offer like half an hour to such stories very late sunday evenings.
You have to get your rss feeds sorted for a solid source of news bud imo.

 

[bluemanc]

freedom of speech is an interesting concept but however the concepts only comes up when its about mocking Muslims or their beliefs,there is no difference between some radical cleric giving a hate speech and provoking people for terrorism and someone abusing or drawing up images of Prophet Mohammed (pbuh) or mocking islam( a religion of 2 billion people) and taking a cover of freedom of speech but my question is where does freedom of speech goes when a footballer shares a joke about jews and gets banned (balotelli) or gets banned for a mere celebration (anelka case ) or you cant talk about holacaust in europe or homophobic text etc ,
only in today's news american rapper snoop dogg is facing a lawsuit for sharing a homophabic image ?where are all the so called human rights organisation supporting freedom of speech or where were they Israel gunned down 17 journalist?accrording to one of guardian articles the same magazine fired a journalist for anti semetic article ,i fully condemn the killings and condolences to the families but mocking beliefs of 2 billion people around the world is no freedom of speech

So the bottom line is, its somebody else's fault.
I wonder if the majority of Muslims think like you do,scary thought.

 

[Wio Gumflapdinand]

I think it was the authorities attacking the hostage takers with stun grenades and other weapons that "flushed" them out from their bolt hole.

Not according to what's coming from the media. It looks like those two went all Butch and Sundance which in turn forced the hand in the Paris supermarket.

A romantic notion i'm afraid, the 2 twats couldn't have got into a worse building, modern printers tend to be like sealed tin cans..health and safety and pollution of ink...there were few windows and doors, the BFST were rubbing their hands
The attack was planned for pre dusk..standard SP.OPs procedure....the 2 twats would have been watched through small optical cameras pushed through drilled holes in the prit works sides, as soon as they got near a door..there was 2 i understand.. mines on the roof were blew as well as the door, they had no chance they would have been dead 30 seconds later

My favourite post of the day and best poster here. What do you do for your day job?
When I read blue underpants posts this what my mind conjures up

That sir is a complement.

 

[Anonymous]

Manchester City.

Muslim owned.

 

[Balti]

freedom of speech is an interesting concept but however the concepts only comes up when its about mocking Muslims or their beliefs,there is no difference between some radical cleric giving a hate speech and provoking people for terrorism and someone abusing or drawing up images of Prophet Mohammed (pbuh) or mocking islam( a religion of 2 billion people) and taking a cover of freedom of speech but my question is where does freedom of speech goes when a footballer shares a joke about jews and gets banned (balotelli) or gets banned for a mere celebration (anelka case ) or you cant talk about holacaust in europe or homophobic text etc ,
only in today's news american rapper snoop dogg is facing a lawsuit for sharing a homophabic image ?where are all the so called human rights organisation supporting freedom of speech or where were they Israel gunned down 17 journalist?accrording to one of guardian articles the same magazine fired a journalist for anti semetic article ,i fully condemn the killings and condolences to the families but mocking beliefs of 2 billion people around the world is no freedom of speech

So the bottom line is, its somebody else's fault.
I wonder if the majority of Muslims think like you do,scary thought.

the murdered and the alleged mocked beliefs put side by side

ycmiu

 

[cleavers]

Manchester City.

Muslim owned.

And I'm sure our owner feels the same outrage as the rest of us do against these radical idiots, who lets be honest are not ordinary muslims, or even true muslims.

 

[Gaylord du Bois]

Manchester City.

Muslim owned.

Now you tell us.

 

[Wio Gumflapdinand]

what no pork humour?!

not even in cartoon form?!?!

The CoC requires you to treat other users with respect. People need to remember that there are posters on here who are Muslim and that our club's owner and his family are as well. They aren't the ones who carried out these atrocities.

Reading some of the views in the thread and concerning our ownership I am surprised some can actually in all good concience remain City fans.

I hope that there are not a lot of our supporters or even our owners reading threads like this and learning just what some of our fans think of them and their religion.

Hyperbole at its finest. I'd say five maybe six have crossed any sort of line with regard to the Muslim faith. Out of what? A near fifty thousand membership? Come on, get a grip.

Sweet suffering jaysus!!. I can just see the headlines tomorrow Mansour pulls out of billion pounds of investment at Manchester City because Alan from Stockport don't like them muzzies much.
So if our owners were Catholics would it be wrong if I was offended by kiddie fiddling priests and not towing the line if I laughed at Life of Brian. Get a grip Captain Bell-End