Shootings in Paris

[stony]

I wondered when the abuse would start.

After that comment, you deserve all the abuse you get.

You have amply demonstrated what i have trying to tell everybody all along i.e. one persons perfectly reasonable and factually true comment can be offensive to another person in whose view the author deserves all the abuse he gets.
One persons free speech it would seem is more sacred than the other's and free speech does cause offence.

Thank you Stony for illustrating this.

No right minded person is offended by a fucking cartoon. Anyone, who is offended is a fucking idiot and anyone who says that satirising someone in a cartoon is grounds for the cartoonist to be murdered is just as bad the cunts who did it. As long as mouth breathing cunts like you seek to apologise and justify those barbaric murdering scum, they will carry on doing it in the name of Allah.
You are a disgrace to the human race.

 

[aguero93:20]

Anyone have the original cartoon?

 

[Scottyboi]

An eye for an eye? What the fuck is that all about. Goalmouth is a dick and a small one at that.

A dangerous few years ahead, how can you beat people who have no morals what so ever and aren't afraid of dying?

 

[Monkfish]

Anyone have the original cartoon?

It wasn't a single cartoon, they had many 'offending' cartoons over many years

 

[Manchester_lalala]

That was a very insightful and constructive comment.
Thanks for taking the time and trouble to contribute.

But it's not an eye for an eye is it? Its 12 lives for publishing some pictures which no-one was forced to look at, if they didn't want to. Losblue's contribution is far more erudite than anything you have brought to this thread so far.

It's one group reacting to the perceived provocation of the other and the other group then reacting in return. Sounds like an eye for an eye to me.

Bluemoons biggest twat award 2015 should end now, you've pissed it. What a wolly.

 

[Wio Gumflapdinand]

If it is used as a deliberate, considered act of provocation, which it was, then it is exactly that.
When the Jyllands Posten newspaper originally published the cartoons, they said that this publication was an attempt to contribute to the debate about criticism of Islam and self-censorship.
In other words a deliberate provocation. You could even call it goading.
It was that act that has led to today's tragedy.

I wouldnt agree with your wording, but the point you raise is an important one.

If the cartoons were not printed the people would still be alive.

It does fill me with great sadness that people have had to die in order that in some bizzarre way our freedom of speech is protected. Of course what will happen is freedoms will be eroded for all as Govts. always use such events to their own advantage.

Wow I didn't even have to go on lobstertube to see a big pair of tits tonight.

 

[SouthStandStander]

After that comment, you deserve all the abuse you get.

You have amply demonstrated what i have trying to tell everybody all along i.e. one persons perfectly reasonable and factually true comment can be offensive to another person in whose view the author deserves all the abuse he gets.
One persons free speech it would seem is more sacred than the other's and free speech does cause offence.

Thank you Stony for illustrating this.

You going to fully illustrate by suicide bombing the south stand then?

Fuck off. We're Muslims in the south stand. Sergio Akbar

 

[DelToro]

Anyone have the original cartoon?

goalmole has it.

He keeps peeking at it to work out how provoked he feels.

 

[Blue Hefner]

Anyone offended by a cartoon needs their head testing!

Anyone who murders people on the strength of the cartoon, claiming offence as justification, are in my opinion, beyond description

I've read some rubbish on here over the years(and I've posted some) but to attempt to rationalise this act by some posters is beyond belief.

 

[Scottyboi]

If it is used as a deliberate, considered act of provocation, which it was, then it is exactly that.
When the Jyllands Posten newspaper originally published the cartoons, they said that this publication was an attempt to contribute to the debate about criticism of Islam and self-censorship.
In other words a deliberate provocation. You could even call it goading.
It was that act that has led to today's tragedy.

I wouldnt agree with your wording, but the point you raise is an important one.

If the cartoons were not printed the people would still be alive.

It does fill me with great sadness that people have had to die in order that in some bizzarre way our freedom of speech is protected. Of course what will happen is freedoms will be eroded for all as Govts. always use such events to their own advantage.

Wow I didn't even have to go on lobstertube to see a big pair of tits tonight.

Clowns, the pair of them!