Should we be looking at new kit deal?- new update pg34 Chelsea NIKE DEAL

[yatesy94]

£12mill a year we get? Considering we're Nikes only English club ambassadors combined with fact of some of the world wide recognised and respected players we already have on our roster KDB, Aguero, Sterling, Silva, Hart etc (Pogba, Gundogan in summer if rumours are to be believed) our next deal should be around the £20mill mark perhaps even doubling it if Nike want to retain our brand.

 

[balotelli's back pocket]

Adidas pls
Or failing that puma.

 

[GeekinGav]

the deal will only improve to the amouts of the Adidas/United if/when we the win the Chumps League and when every glory hunting United fans switches over to whichever glory winning side of the next decade.

 

[better dead than red]

Under Armour gear is quality. You can't pay me to wear Nike outside of City shirts. Spurs kits look great IMO.

Agree with Under Armour for the most part. Though their sunglasses and boots, for the most part, are poorly made rubbish.

 

[JOGAMIGMOG]

Spurs' home kit is complete gash. Gash with a sash! If our home kit came with a sash there'd be public floggings of the designer (I hope).

 

[Phelan's Pace]

Surprised PSG are above us as I would say we are more known globally than them at present.

 

[City_Sean]

Now we've got Pep, coupled with the deal in China we should be rightly pushing for a new deal.

 

[Why Always Ste]

Has Reebok been mentioned in this thread?

It's the main provider for UFC which ADUG has an investment in, and or its parent company is Adidas so maybe we could go with them eventually.
Nycfc is with Adidas, understandably however due to their kit deal with the whole league

 

[mancity dan]

Some of our worst kits were Reebok. Hate the material.

 

[cinnamon blue]

Nike quality is shite not a patch on umbro