Should we now go after the papers?

[OntarioBlue]

I think first off wait for the full verdict and read what it says. Then select targets carefully - individuals would be the best - if Roan said something that is demonstrably incorrect then sue HIM not the BBC. If a journo writing for a paper does the same do the same back - put the fear of god up journalists and just for the giggles pick your targets and serve papers on them all first thing on the same morning in dawn raids.

I think you are spot on.

Wait for the written arbitration decision. Then, if any individual or entity made libellous statements about the Club sue them or, and this is my preferred choice, if any individual or entity made derogatory or disparaging comments about the Club ban them. It’s a long list.

 

[SidJames]

I am for honest reporting.

I can even tolerate biased reporting.

What i can not tolerate,is blatant lies,inaccurate reporting,slander,defamation of character,character assassination.

Some of it is disgraceful.

 

[tolmie's hairdoo]

No idea but we could engage in vegetable throwing at them as they walk passed.

Door to the left of the garden of remembrance.

Quite fitting in some ways?

 

[domalino]

Door to the left of the garden of remembrance.

Quite fitting in some ways?

Do you think there will be any reckoning for your colleagues in the press box TH? Or just business as usual, water under the bridge stuff?