Sign Pizarro, yes or no?

[citytill1die84]

Yes good squad player.

 

[LoveCity]

Yes! Unless we can identify someone alike at a reasonable price. Ever Banega would be good here but I don't think his price would be reasonable and we can probably get some years out of Pizarro in a limited role.

 

[1961RICH]

No for - good player and have been impressed 60% of the time, he reads the game well and is able to create openings but age is against him.
Younger box to box options out there.

 

[buckotheblue]

No

 

[sale blue]

Not a step forward. out of his depth yesterday and far to slow, we need speed

A big No

 

[Dave Ewing's Back 'eader]

Ten years too late.

 

[oakiecokie]

Would you buy Pizarro permanently, yes or no?

He seems to help out in training alot (judging from inside city), and has changed games.

Simple yes or no.

Me: Yes.

a decent player, but too old and too slow.

Therefore he fits nicely into the rest of the midfield requirements for City.

 

[brady0]

If Roma are willing to let him go for a nominal fee I would keep him. He's a good player to play for half an hour. Its hard to tell whether he has struggled with fitness due to his age or due to lack of first team action earlier in the season. If it is the latter he's got to be worth keeping.

 

[oakiecokie]

Would you buy Pizarro permanently, yes or no?

He seems to help out in training alot (judging from inside city), and has changed games.

Simple yes or no.

Me: Yes.

Yesterday's mistake aside, he's played some amazing passes and looked rather decent. But he's too old.

No

WTF ??
Are you blaming him for being unable to reach a shit ball that was overhit from the defense ?? At that stage of the game it should have ended up at least by the halfway line.

 

[bapi]

If he would cost less than 1M: YES!