Simon Stone and Dan Roan

[Prestwich_Blue]

What I’d like to know is what he actually does, as a full time employee of the BBC he’s paid by the license fee payers. His articles probably take him about about 5 minutes, he goes to the manager’s press conference and speaks occasionally on radio, not allowed on Tv until after the watershed.

It would appear, according to some on here, that he spends a considerable amount of time hanging around schools, childrens' playgrounds or locked in a toilet cubicle at Carrington. Outrageous slurs of course.

 

[hertsblue]

Simon Stone..
16th Feb: is the Man United legend Paul Scholes making an early impact at Oldham........?

& Today:..Scholes quit long before a worthwhile judgement on his abilities could be made.

These are totally embarrassing articles. But not surprised as sums up the BBC. How he could write after 2 games about the early impact is laughable and the entire football world now has judged Scholes on his management abilities and resigning by text message. Another shocking article to go with his first one

 

[feedmpenzaandhewillscore]

If the BBC is impartial due to the unique way it's funded then why does his Twitter account have a picture of the piss can on it.

One for his wank bank.

 

[johnnytapia]

It would appear, according to some on here, that he spends a considerable amount of time hanging around schools, childrens' playgrounds or locked in a toilet cubicle at Carrington. Outrageous slurs of course.

children's - it's an irregular plural. Thank you.

 

[waspish]

Why do we have a thread on a no mark.

 

[malg]

Why do we have a thread on a no mark.

Thanks. Thought it was just me. That fucking tool will get off on this.

 

[Newman Noggs]

I bet he's the Sly one of the Stone family.

 

[Centurions]

Gutted, thought this was an RIP thread.

It must be wrong to like this post but sod it...

 

[mccity]

If he were a Man United correspondent I wouldn't mind, it'd be par for course if anything.

But what's annoying is that he's part of this whole collective of reporters who are SUPPOSED to be neutral but aren't. It's the same with all the 'Manchester' correspondents who have a special interest in United, or the horde of north-west reporters who only care about United or Liverpool.

 

[cookster]

It must be wrong to like this post but sod it...

I know mate, what expecting a warning but it was tongue in cheek. Whilst on the subject of tongue's I wonder if Stones can get his removed from the arse of the Rags.