pauldominic
Well-Known Member
leighton said:mrcunny said:gave the irish too much respect,dire performance indeed...
It wasnt a dire preformance you were out played by a better team its simple as that. Ireland upped there level and England couldnt cope with it. All through the 6 Nations Ireland didnt click passing wise at times and mistakes but once it clicks Ireland has got a great team. Your flyhalf in the first half got fuck all ball and was targeted by Ireland in the game no wonder Johnny came on for him.
I just don't agree with this analysis.
You could use the same argument about any contest in sport.
such and such a team played poorly because the opposition wouldn't let them play well. Its a nonsense argument.
A proper analysis defines the causal relationships
Compare the England Team of 2003 with this one.
Stuffed full of leadership everywhere - Johnson, Dawson, Wilkinson, Vickery, Tindall, Robinson etc etc.
Almost no leadership in yesterday's team.
EDIT: Interesting that the tide of points stopped as soon as Wilkinson, Thompson and Shaw came on.
quod erat demonstrandum
-- Sun Mar 20, 2011 2:31 pm --
JoeMercer'sWay said:typical pro-irish "yay we beat england so are automatically superior"
england won the 6 nations because they were the best team, Ireland just got up for last night as they had the chance to stop the Grand Slam on home turf.
England will keep improving to the World Cup, and I back them again to be the best Northern Hemisphere team.
Exactly.
Precisely put.