So goodbye then Scottie...

[billfromthehill]

You r livin da past yo
Wat did he do wrong ???

 

[Lavinda Past]

Has he gone? Good luck to the lad. A poor signing but that's not his fault. He kept his head down and didn't moan despite not getting games.

I concur Dave, he was a very poor signing and it wasn't his fault - but let's face it... if you were on a three year 60K+ per week contract, would you moan?

In the short time he was on the pitch, he looked no better than a sprinter with football boots on. I felt embarrassed for him.

 

[billfromthehill]

Has he gone? Good luck to the lad. A poor signing but that's not his fault. He kept his head down and didn't moan despite not getting games.

I concur Dave, he was a very poor signing and it wasn't his fault - but let's face it... if you were on a three year 60K+ per week contract, would you moan?

In the short time he was on the pitch, he looked no better than a sprinter with football boots on. I felt embarrassed for him.

Why do you feel embarrassed for the lad ???

 

[MaineBlue88]

I bet he was partially influenced by Helen Flanagan to make the move since she likes being a WAG, he's a talented player but really should of stopped at Swansea.

 

[fredmont]

Albeit temporarily.

You were indeed one of the worst players I've seen in a City shirt for some time.

The original 'no trick donkey'... Your (ex) bird was the only interesting thing about you.

Good luck at WBA.

Bit harsh really, he was a better player at Swansea. Probably just lacking on confidence.

No wonder, Mancini says he's great in training then match day at home 2 or 3 up with 20 to go, to save legs Mancini calls for a sub to come on who ends up playing on the left in front of Clichy. Does he shout for Scott , nothing to lose because the game is ours. No, f**kin Kolorov piles on. That would ruin anybody's confidence.
I reckon he was just a pawn in the Mancini/Marwood power battle . Still don't know to this day whether he's good or not. Shame really. Hope he does well at WBA.

 

[akcity]

I think he was a political pawn really.

I don't think Mancini wanted him and that was evident by the fact that he never played him.

I think Marwood had a lot to do with this signing.

 

[TGR]

Albeit temporarily.

You were indeed one of the worst players I've seen in a City shirt for some time.

The original 'no trick donkey'... Your (ex) bird was the only interesting thing about you.

Good luck at WBA.

Not the worst player to pull on our shirt by a long chalk. But at least he kept his head down
and his moth shut - unlike some we could mention.
It was obvious Mancini never fancied him from day 1. A Marwood signing without a doubt.

 

[Lavinda Past]

Has he gone? Good luck to the lad. A poor signing but that's not his fault. He kept his head down and didn't moan despite not getting games.

I concur Dave, he was a very poor signing and it wasn't his fault - but let's face it... if you were on a three year 60K+ per week contract, would you moan?

In the short time he was on the pitch, he looked no better than a sprinter with football boots on. I felt embarrassed for him.

Why do you feel embarrassed for the lad ???

Simple... He was well out of his depth. Look at his loan record - The lad should never have come to City. Political pawn or not - an average player is an average player. Sinclair would look good in a Championship side - I hope he does OK at WBA.

 

[ninjamonkey]

Not his fault but he's nowhere near good enough for us. Seemed a decent lad, kept his head down, never moaned. Good luck to him at West Brom, probably his level.

 

[Mr Partridge]

He isn't even the worst player we've had in the last year.