so this agenda thing.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Barclay's full of shit... if Maureen had done this the press eoukd have hailed him a genius and stroked his ego!
Seriously, are the media so fucking stupid? Suerly they knew that us starting NYCFC, Melbourne City etc. meant we could loan players between teams, blood youngsters!?!
 
dario2739 said:
Barclay's full of shit... if Maureen had done this the press eoukd have hailed him a genius and stroked his ego!
Seriously, are the media so fucking stupid? Suerly they knew that us starting NYCFC, Melbourne City etc. meant we could loan players between teams, blood youngsters!?!
If any other team done this it would be a masterstroke,as its us its viewed ( wrongly) as the rules being bent,surprised one of the hacks hasn't spouted about us being docked points or some other bollocks to that effect,Wenger was up in arms over this but forgets he took henry on loan,what's the difference....
 
deano ou812 said:
dario2739 said:
Barclay's full of shit... if Maureen had done this the press eoukd have hailed him a genius and stroked his ego!
Seriously, are the media so fucking stupid? Suerly they knew that us starting NYCFC, Melbourne City etc. meant we could loan players between teams, blood youngsters!?!
If any other team done this it would be a masterstroke,as its us its viewed ( wrongly) as the rules being bent,surprised one of the hacks hasn't spouted about us being docked points or some other bollocks to that effect,Wenger was up in arms over this but forgets he took henry on loan,what's the difference....

the difference is its us.

* awaits the rag non agendaists to comment*
 
George Hannah said:
blue underpants said:
I suggest people have a look at the Sunday Supplement thread, sums the agenda up to a tee
HERE YOU ARE FOLKS TODAY'S ATTACK DON'T STRAIN YOUR FINGERS

[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrQW6444zjk[/video]



I do honestly think ( there words not mine) that these three loons should be investigated by the police as they are obviously on something! No more comments.
 
You never get far from the school yard whatever age you are.

So the school bully terrorises the other kids who try as hard as they can to be his friend. They all hate the school bully but accept
the status quo and rationalise it in their own mind. After a while the school bully moves on and picks on other newer kids.
The first lot of kids laugh to themselves relieved that it's no longer them that are being picked on and that they are the bully's "friend".
One day yet another new kid joins the school and he seems okay. After a while the bully picks on this newest kid and the newest kid
puts the bully on his arse. Who does the whole school hate? The newest kid of course. He's done the unthinkable and made the whole
school look small. The established pecking order has been overturned and months or even years of crawling now count for nothing.

The media are just a bunch of frightened school kids. City have made them all look small.

In time the media will fawn over us. Personally I think I prefer it as it is now. My only worry is the effect that they are having on us
attracting new fans within the UK & ROI. Globally it appears to be less of an issue.

The various governing bodies and referees are more of a concern.
 
Let’s look at this

1, There would not be a New York City if we’re not for Manchester City, do other clubs i.e. Chelsea not loan players or had loan players in the past , as far as I’m concerned it’s the end of any argument.

Our owner purchased land that was a desert totally polluted by chemical waste, converting it into the finest academy on this planet. In doing so used local labour to build the place, 80% of the materials used were sauced locally, it is now providing work for local people in the everyday running, enhancing the area itself.
Manchester City have never been behind the door when producing youth, this can only get better with the facilities provided.
Our youth teams at present are more than capable of holding their own, ask Bayer Munich who were turned over 6-0 nil a couple of weeks ago, just one of many.
Why should we be expected to bring English youth through the ranks, our academy was built to improve Manchester City’s position in the world so if this means that we have a healthy crop of foreign players who gives a toss, at the end of the day what has England done for Manchester City However, if we do produce a good crop of English players then fine.

“What is the problem” other than of course an agenda a individual has in portraying Manchester City as a big bad boy!!
 
de niro said:
deano ou812 said:
dario2739 said:
Barclay's full of shit... if Maureen had done this the press eoukd have hailed him a genius and stroked his ego!
Seriously, are the media so fucking stupid? Suerly they knew that us starting NYCFC, Melbourne City etc. meant we could loan players between teams, blood youngsters!?!
If any other team done this it would be a masterstroke,as its us its viewed ( wrongly) as the rules being bent,surprised one of the hacks hasn't spouted about us being docked points or some other bollocks to that effect,Wenger was up in arms over this but forgets he took henry on loan,what's the difference....

the difference is its us.

* awaits the rag non agendaists to comment*

The difference is Arsenal had no financial control or interest in New York Bulls.
 
franksinatra said:
de niro said:
deano ou812 said:
If any other team done this it would be a masterstroke,as its us its viewed ( wrongly) as the rules being bent,surprised one of the hacks hasn't spouted about us being docked points or some other bollocks to that effect,Wenger was up in arms over this but forgets he took henry on loan,what's the difference....

the difference is its us.

* awaits the rag non agendaists to comment*

The difference is Arsenal had no financial control or interest in New York Bulls.
so you think the Lampard loan has tarnished our image?
 
franksinatra said:
de niro said:
deano ou812 said:
If any other team done this it would be a masterstroke,as its us its viewed ( wrongly) as the rules being bent,surprised one of the hacks hasn't spouted about us being docked points or some other bollocks to that effect,Wenger was up in arms over this but forgets he took henry on loan,what's the difference....

the difference is its us.

* awaits the rag non agendaists to comment*

The difference is Arsenal had no financial control or interest in New York Bulls.

the same arsenal that voted for financial restrictions from the prem...against us. we fought back and they dont like it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.