Let’s look at this
1, There would not be a New York City if we’re not for Manchester City, do other clubs i.e. Chelsea not loan players or had loan players in the past , as far as I’m concerned it’s the end of any argument.
Our owner purchased land that was a desert totally polluted by chemical waste, converting it into the finest academy on this planet. In doing so used local labour to build the place, 80% of the materials used were sauced locally, it is now providing work for local people in the everyday running, enhancing the area itself.
Manchester City have never been behind the door when producing youth, this can only get better with the facilities provided.
Our youth teams at present are more than capable of holding their own, ask Bayer Munich who were turned over 6-0 nil a couple of weeks ago, just one of many.
Why should we be expected to bring English youth through the ranks, our academy was built to improve Manchester City’s position in the world so if this means that we have a healthy crop of foreign players who gives a toss, at the end of the day what has England done for Manchester City However, if we do produce a good crop of English players then fine.
“What is the problem” other than of course an agenda a individual has in portraying Manchester City as a big bad boy!!