Dribble
Well-Known Member
BlueAnorak said:Agenda of the Manchester Football Correspondent...
A lot of our problems are down the fact that the journalist nominally assigned to cover City ihome games is often the journalist who covers all thing raggy.
Consider the Telegraph where the so called "Northern" football correspondent, one Mark Ogden He is a rag. Ran a united fanzine and worked for MUTV before getting the job at the Telegraph. Whenever he gets a City game to report on it is written through red tinted glasses. Consider Yesterdays match report:
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/competitions/league-cup/11119054/Tottenham-Hotspur-3-Nottingham-Forest-1-Capital-One-Cup-match-report-Championship-leaders-denied.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/footba ... enied.html</a>
Manchester City 7 Sheffield Wednesday 0, Capital One Cup: Manuel Pellegrini's side stroll into fourth round
Manuel Pellegrini's side stroll into fourth round following seven-goal rout at the Etihad Stadium
By Mark Ogden, Northern Football Correspondent, Etihad Stadium
Frank Lampard was supposed to offer no more than experienced cover at Manchester City, but his loan move to the Etihad Stadium is developing into the fairytale of the New Yorker.”
Can you imagine a Utd 7-0 win being written up in same way?
TBH mate, I don't quite see what's wrong with that report. I gave my ticktet for Wednesday to a mate as I couldn't attend due to work commitments, but I did listen to the match on GMR and tbf, the above report kind of summed up what The Goat and Ian Cheeseman were saying.
At one point, Cheeseman commented how annonymous Lampard had been during the first half, he went on to say that it was 30 minutes in and he could't quite remember if he'd mentioned his name yet. They both commented that Wednesday had brough 7000+ fans with them and seemed more up for the scrap than we were and they were controlling large parts of the first half with some ultra high energy football.
The media are what they are and after crawling up ManUre's arse for a 1/4 of a decade, they're hardly likely to just drop them in favour of their favourite joke club City. It took time for City to be taken seriously and I believe it will take a change of the old guard before we see a change in attitudes toward us. In the meantime it gives me a warm glow inside to know they're typing away with fingers stiffened by rage whilst trying to be unbiased.
My son plays football for a kids team and its very noticeable that the majority of the kids turn up for the non-club training sessions sporting City kits and ManUre kits are now the exception and no longer the rule. These kids are our future Ogden's and Herbert's and fans in general. When the aforementioned retire or move on, our next generation of fans will replace them and it's only then I can see the balance being redressed.
Although I hate Manure to the point that I can only bare to watch them when we have to play them, I hope that when our generation of support replaces the Ogden's and Herbert's of this world, that they themselves have more class in respect to their career's and report the matches as they see them. If Gary 'Rat Boy' Neville can do it (albeit through gritted teeth) then so can any of our fans if they reach a level of prominence in the media.
Personally I have no issues with the Telegraph report.