Splashing cyclistst

[Challenger1978]

Although I understand your logic would you apply it to motorbikes? Lots of them are killed by stupid drivers as well but I doubt you would condone any riding on the pavements.

Force = mass x acceleration

A motorbike is significantly heavier and faster than a bicycle and would if it was to impact in to someone cause considerably more damaging. So no I wouldn't recommend motorbikes riding on pavements.

 

[LittleStan]

Although I understand your logic would you apply it to motorbikes? Lots of them are killed by stupid drivers as well but I doubt you would condone any riding on the pavements.

Force = mass x acceleration

A motorbike is significantly heavier and faster than a bicycle and would if it was to impact in to someone cause considerably more damaging. So no I wouldn't recommend motorbikes riding on pavements.

Clearly not and I think you are deliberately missing my point.

Roads are dangerous for cyclists so your solution is to move danger to the pavements instead of tackling the reason for the dangerous conditions.

Your argument is does not make sense.

 

[Challenger1978]

Although I understand your logic would you apply it to motorbikes? Lots of them are killed by stupid drivers as well but I doubt you would condone any riding on the pavements.

Force = mass x acceleration

A motorbike is significantly heavier and faster than a bicycle and would if it was to impact in to someone cause considerably more damaging. So no I wouldn't recommend motorbikes riding on pavements.

Clearly not and I think you are deliberately missing my point.

Roads are dangerous for cyclists so your solution is to move danger to the pavements instead of tackling the reason for the dangerous conditions.

Your argument is does not make sense.

Firstly i never said that, secondly yeah ok.