happychappy
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 22 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 1,347
Got to laugh, but Bit late in the day for all of us who’ve purchased train tickets
If you can't fulfil a fixture it's an automatic 3-0 win to the opposition. The game can't be postponed unless we agree to it and there isn't another point in the fixture schedule when it can be played without badly affecting us.They definitely can postpone it, we'll just be dead against that option so it'll be one of the last resorts. If they can't find another solution then we'll just have to get on with it. No different to if it was postponed for weather etc.
If you can't fulfil a fixture it's an automatic 3-0 win to the opposition. The game can't be postponed unless we agree to it and there isn't another point in the fixture schedule when it can be played without badly affecting us.
So the game can only:
(1) Be moved to West Ham or Arsenal(who don't play at home that day)
(2)Played at WHL at much rediued capacity. (with all City away fans accommodated).
Then there are all the City fans who have bought train tickets!
Spurs are hilarious under Levy, what a farce. It's like Swales has been reincarnated.
Complex construction on a tight schedule where delays are commonplace. Add to that the rules about one home stadium per season and this should not have happened. Not sure why you're defending them. The possibility of a failed test event should have been factored in.Hardly.
This stadium build is a massive, complex construction project that had an incredibly tight schedule. Despite this, the stadium remained on course to open on 15th September (albeit with some jobs yet to be completed) until the first test event exposed serious issues with safety systems. So the stadium will be delayed by a further month or so. Disappointing, certainly. But not farcical. Anyone in the construction industry will tell you that, on such big projects, such delays are commonplace.
Once the stadium opens and everyone sees how impressive it really is, the couple of months' delay will soon be forgotten.
Complex construction on a tight schedule where delays are commonplace. Add to that the rules about one home stadium per season and this should not have happened. Not sure why you're defending them. The possibility of a failed test event should have been factored in.
Agreed. Comparing Levy to Swales is completely OTT. You only have to compare the Umbro Stand to what WHL will look like to appreciate that.Hardly.
This stadium build is a massive, complex construction project that had an incredibly tight schedule. Despite this, the stadium remained on course to open on 15th September (albeit with some jobs yet to be completed) until the first test event exposed serious issues with safety systems. So the stadium will be delayed by a further month or so. Disappointing, certainly. But not farcical. Anyone in the construction industry will tell you that, on such big projects, such delays are commonplace.
Once the stadium opens and everyone sees how impressive it really is, the couple of months' delay will soon be forgotten.
Agreed. Comparing Levy to Swales is completely OTT. You only have to compare the Umbro Stand to what WHL will look like to appreciate that.