Spurs fans...

[mancboy123]

After the amount of times united have bent spurs over in the past specifically over the berbatov incident its pathetic to see them sticking up for them so much.

 

[Skashion]

The vast majority of Spurs fans on forums and in life are complete tossers who vastly overestimate their own importance. They've won two league titles, same as us, we've been to the same amount of FA Cup finals, and yet they think we're more on West Ham's level than theirs according to most Spurs fans I've met. The one smidgeon of respect I had was for their fanbase turning up but the Europa League has shown them up for the farcical hypocrites I'd always held them up to be in every other regard. Now it's the full Royal Flush and I'd happily flush this turd of a club into obscurity if disaster even befalls them. Second only to the rags and forums like glory-glory remind me why; they fucking love the rags because they have so much in common as fans.

 

[greasedupdeafguy]

The vast majority of Spurs fans on forums and in life are complete tossers who vastly overestimate their own importance. They've won two league titles, same as us, we've been to the same amount of FA Cup finals, and yet they think we're more on West Ham's level than theirs according to most Spurs fans I've met. The one smidgeon of respect I had was for their fanbase turning up but the Europa League has shown them up for the farcical hypocrites I'd always held them up to be in every other regard. Now it's the full Royal Flush and I'd happily flush this turd of a club into obscurity if disaster even befalls them. Second only to the rags and forums like glory-glory remind me why; they fucking love the rags because they have so much in common as fans.

Agree with all that

 

[lee-mcfc]

where are all the spurs fans who come on here? ha but they were crying when they seen the score. bellends

 

[spurspinter1]

where are all the spurs fans who come on here? ha but they were crying when they seen the score. bellends

"when they seen" what score?


I haven't been on for a while as I kept on answering the capcha question thing wrong, thought Dickov scored first and Horlock that equalised so I assumed it was my cookies and DNS causing the log in issue rather than checking on wiki....

Time to get stuck in to some anti Spurs comments now I'm here though! Congrats on the result by the way, I watched it with a Utd mate of mine and it was rather awkward, luckily I enjoy social tension so cheers for that one.....<br /><br />-- Tue Oct 25, 2011 3:11 pm --<br /><br />

1. The vast majority of Spurs fans on forums and in life are complete tossers who vastly overestimate their own importance. 2. They've won two league titles, same as us, we've been to the same amount of FA Cup finals, and yet they think we're more on West Ham's level than theirs according to most Spurs fans I've met. The one smidgeon of respect I had was for their fanbase turning up but the Europa League has shown them up for the farcical hypocrites I'd always held them up to be in every other regard. Now it's the full Royal Flush and I'd happily flush this turd of a club into obscurity if disaster even befalls them. 3.Second only to the rags and forums like glory-glory remind me why; they fucking love the rags because they have so much in common as fans.

1. You are saying you've met the majority of Spurs fans in the internet and in real life? Where do you find the time to support man city?!

2. The same amount of FA Cup finals? haha. Truth is West Ham will probably be on your level soon enough, if they get the lovely stadium in the lovely area and get back in to the lovely premiership they'll by the next to be taken over.

3. We do not love the "rags" (I've never understood that term...), and on that particular thread on GG there is a fairly level headed debate about the whole subject, its probably 50/50 either way (apart from me on the fence of course...). We have very little in common with Utd fans, they are used to winning many trophies, we unfortunately are not, we had much more in common with you guys until recent times

 

[bluevengence]

We have very little in common with Utd fans

Fook off you all live in the same area

 

[Skashion]

1. You are saying you've met the majority of Spurs fans in the internet and in real life? Where do you find the time to support man city?!

2. The same amount of FA Cup finals? haha. Truth is West Ham will probably be on your level soon enough, if they get the lovely stadium in the lovely area and get back in to the lovely premiership they'll by the next to be taken over.

3. We do not love the "rags" (I've never understood that term...), and on that particular thread on GG there is a fairly level headed debate about the whole subject, its probably 50/50 either way (apart from me on the fence of course...). We have very little in common with Utd fans, they are used to winning many trophies, we unfortunately are not, we had much more in common with you guys until recent times

1. Obviously not, I should have said of those I've 'met' (including internet 'met'). Look, I acknowledged an error, maybe you can acknowledge your lie. As for supporting City, I have a seasoncard and I was there on Sunday though so I imagine I go to games quite a bit more often than you do. :-)

2. Yes, the same amount finals. You've won more of yours true enough but winning, especially replays, is easier when you're in London and always have home advantage isn't it? The team doesn't have to travel and you've then got crowd advantage as well.

Ah, another deluded Spurs fan. Soon, relatively, you'll be a team closer, and I mean actually close (not-just-in-my-deluded-Spurs-supporting-head close) to West Ham. What an embarrassment that will be to you. By the by, do you lot consider Villa to be a bigger club? What about Notts Forest, surely they are?

3. In my experience you do, the shared dislike of Arsenal and shared belief of the divine right of your club to form a permanent part of England's elite, brings you together in a perfect storm of self-congratulating messy mutual masturbation.

 

[Bilston Blue]

That will be nine each, then. So, yes indeed, the same number of FA Cup Final appearances.

Forgive me if I'm wrong, but I've taken my information from here:
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.myfootballfacts.com/FACupFinalAppearances1871-72to2008-09.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.myfootballfacts.com/FACupFin ... 08-09.html</a>

The site is run by our very own Bluemoon statistician and footballing anorak.

Oh, his username on here is THFC6061.

 

[spurspinter1]

1. We should look at buying one or two of their wantaways come the end of the season.....Modric would be excellent in a good side, same with Bale to. So sad to see such good quality go to waste in what is mid to top ten side.

I hate to see that, it's like seeing some old fella driving a sports car that never gets over 50mph. Total total waste on talent. Modric will go at a reasonable price as he's desperate to play with real quality. Bale's a bit thick but we could offer him real stardom, rather than the current Europa and a mid table lifestyle.

Saying that I don't think either would get in our current side, but they both would almost definitely get in our Carling cup squad.

2. Spurs have spent millions upon millions and yet still they languish behind Alan Pardews NUFC......It's that sort of frustration around a clubs lack of endeavour that turns the fans into bitter, jealous followers.....Just look at how they complain about West ham and the Olympic stadium!!.......No wonder Modric, Bale and many more will soon want out.

1. What is a mid to top ten side? Surely in a leage of 20, 10th place is a direct definition of mid, so you're saying a mid to mid side? And to add that this mid to mid side has offered these players the opportunity to play in a champions league quarter final, has your club done that? I think if we finish 4th neither will want to leave, and I can't see how Modric would fit in to Mancini's side, it wouldn't be the best use of 40m for you.

Also regarding your waste of talent theory, did Matt le Tissier waste his talent?

2. <a class="postlink" href="http://www.transferleague.co.uk/league-tables/1992-to-2011.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.transferleague.co.uk/league- ... -2011.html</a>

These stats are not including the summer transfer window in which we sold 28m worth of dross and improved the squad with a free, a loan and a 5m signing.

Our wages/turnover is at 56% according to the Guardian in 2011

So money wise, we haven't spent that much to be where we are now.

We are 3 points behind Newcastle, and they have played one more game than us. They are in good form though...

-- Tue Oct 25, 2011 3:28 pm --

We have very little in common with Utd fans

Fook off you all live in the same area

haha, ironically I live in the north-west...

-- Tue Oct 25, 2011 3:37 pm --

1. You are saying you've met the majority of Spurs fans in the internet and in real life? Where do you find the time to support man city?!

2. The same amount of FA Cup finals? haha. Truth is West Ham will probably be on your level soon enough, if they get the lovely stadium in the lovely area and get back in to the lovely premiership they'll by the next to be taken over.

3. We do not love the "rags" (I've never understood that term...), and on that particular thread on GG there is a fairly level headed debate about the whole subject, its probably 50/50 either way (apart from me on the fence of course...). We have very little in common with Utd fans, they are used to winning many trophies, we unfortunately are not, we had much more in common with you guys until recent times

1. Obviously not, I should have said of those I've 'met' (including internet 'met'). Look, I acknowledged an error, maybe you can acknowledge your lie. As for supporting City, I have a seasoncard and I was there on Sunday though so I imagine I go to games quite a bit more often than you do. :-)

2. Yes, the same amount finals. You've won more of yours true enough but winning, especially replays, is easier when you're in London and always have home advantage isn't it? The team doesn't have to travel and you've then got crowd advantage as well.

Ah, another deluded Spurs fan. Soon, relatively, you'll be a team closer, and I mean actually close (not-just-in-my-deluded-Spurs-supporting-head close) to West Ham. What an embarrassment that will be to you. By the by, do you lot consider Villa to be a bigger club? What about Notts Forest, surely they are?

3. In my experience you do, the shared dislike of Arsenal and shared belief of the divine right of your club to form a permanent part of England's elite, brings you together in a perfect storm of self-congratulating messy mutual masturbation.

1. Hehe, please don't mention that thread, it is dead and buried, and came to some sort of sane conclusion in the end IIRC. Point one was rather pedantic.

2. To the other guy, it wasn't the reliablity of the information I found funny.

I'm not sure what you mean with the West Ham stuff, I'm fairly certain they'll be competing at the top within a decade or so. Champions league semis will be as follows....

Anzhi vs Man City

West Ham vs PSG

But I won't feel bitter about it, I hold nothing against the fans of these clubs whatsoever, all of the above may as well enjoy it

Are you asking whether Villa are a bigger club than Spurs? I have said on this board that I don't subscribe to the notion of big clubs and those kind of arguments. I do like Forest though, saw them play a lot when I was younger.

3. The more Malaga and PSG's that occur the less I dislike Arsenal, and I'm not sure what divine right you are talking about, but you are entitled to that opinion I guess.<br /><br />-- Tue Oct 25, 2011 3:50 pm --<br /><br />

After the amount of times united have bent spurs over in the past specifically over the berbatov incident its pathetic to see them sticking up for them so much.

It wasn't that bad mate, they gave us frazier cambell on loan remember?


*cries in corner

 

[Skashion]

2. To the other guy, it wasn't the reliablity of the information I found funny.

I'm not sure what you mean with the West Ham stuff, I'm fairly certain they'll be competing at the top within a decade or so. Champions league semis will be as follows....

Anzhi vs Man City

West Ham vs PSG

But I won't feel bitter about it, I hold nothing against the fans of these clubs whatsoever, all of the above may as well enjoy it

Are you asking whether Villa are a bigger club than Spurs? I have said on this board that I don't subscribe to the notion of big clubs and those kind of arguments. I do like Forest though, saw them play a lot when I was younger.

3. The more Malaga and PSG's that occur the less I dislike Arsenal, and I'm not sure what divine right you are talking about, but you are entitled to that opinion I guess.

2. Fair enough if that's what you believe. I'd love for West Ham to be up there with us. I have an affinity with West Ham fans - those I've met I should stress. Think West Ham, sadly, are more likely to go the other way but I hope I'm wrong. Maybe you have a better idea because you'll be more acquainted with the benefits of having the former Olympic Stadium.

2 & 3. I was asking that, yes. Again, fair enough if you don't believe in big clubs. Again, in my experience, most Spurs fans would say they are part of a big five - and indeed that is the way the Premier League started, and would say they were bigger than clubs like Villa and Forest but those clubs have far better trophy cabinets than Spurs in my assessment. I don't think they are bigger clubs but I can't see how most Spurs fans would come to that assessment if they were being self-consistent with their scuse-me-sport-I-couldn't-help-noticin'-that-we've-got-a-considerably-better-trophy-cabinet-than-yew logic.