Sk@mcfc
Well-Known Member
Shite ref but all on us today as to why we didn’t win that ,we should of been out of site in first half if not for shite finishing , onwards blues we will come good as always
It was betterI’m away so only got chance to see the second half. Which was shite.
Absolutely livid (still) at that decision at the end. Surprised they (FA/PGMOL) haven’t released any form of explanation about it.
Was the first half any better?
They are missing 10 players thoughNo, spurs should have been tonked today by at least 4 goals.
There are better managers out there.
I don’t understand what Pep’s plan B is without Stones.Pep needs to shoulder some of the blame though. Asking him to fill a role he's struggling in.
You'd want to look at that again.Having looked at it a couple of times now, Hooper blows (albeit quietly) when Haaland gets fouled, signals for a City free kick, Haaland thinks he's playing advantage so carries on, then the ref blows up again for him kicking a moving ball. A bad call but not as mystifying as I first thought.
He will need a plan C on Wednesday night without Rodri and StonesI don’t understand what Pep’s plan B is without Stones.
I've watched the same video. Hooper does blow, just not loudly enough. It's still bad refereeing, just not as mind numbing as it seemed.No sky showed it with the sound amplified. He goes to blow, sees Haaland has recovered, takes his whistle away and looks like he's playing on. After the pass is made you clearly hear the whistle.
I've watched the same video. Hooper does blow, just not loudly enough. It's still bad refereeing, just not as mind numbing as it seemed.
I do love these statements, because of our shite finishing, even though we scored 3 goals, and when we could have had one more if the ref hadn’t of fucked us over.Shite ref but all on us today as to why we didn’t win that ,we should of been out of site in first half if not for shite finishing , onwards blues we will come good as always