Machiavelli
Well-Known Member
It’s Ndombele ffs.
About 65m , but we’ve had to pay 1bn for a stadium , next year if you’re lucky enough to get to WHL you’ll realise it’s been a worth while investment , ITS the best stadium I’ve been to , Including Dortmund ,Ajax and OT , but no I’ve never been to SAN Siri ( too old) nor Barca nor Rm’sHow much was nDembele ?
What's this "we unlike City" quotes, we heard you the first time, you've no need to repeat it 3 times, btw you beat our transfer record the other day, so your club isn't short of money as you make out.Well we’ve got NDembele and Clarke and it’s pretty strong that we are getting the Sessengnon twins and possible Ceballos on loan , we unlike City can’t afford a buy out clause of 80m for Celso
About 65m , but we’ve had to pay 1bn for a stadium , next year if you’re lucky enough to get to WHL you’ll realise it’s been a worth while investment , ITS the best stadium I’ve been to , Including Dortmund ,Ajax and OT , but no I’ve never been to SAN Siri ( too old) nor Barca nor Rm’s
We also have ones of the countries best training centre . I’ve often get to Chelsea and Fulham’s training grounds, as my son does refereeing down at their academies , and whilst they’re good they’re not a patch on Hotspur way
What's this "we unlike City" quotes, we heard you the first time, you've no need to repeat it 3 times, btw you beat our transfer record the other day, so your club isn't short of money as you make out.
You’re including the swamp as one of the great stadiums of Europe?
Fucking Hell!
The media hype is certainly working. The shithole in Trafford is just that; it’s falling apart and is full of leaks.
I judge a stadium on ease of access , and view point and atmosphere created by the Away fans , for that it’s good , better than the Etihad , in three tiers . Newcastle is a great stadium but the viewing is awful , once you get up them stairs .
I’ve always loved Villa Park , great old stadium, and Fulham is great , except in February with the cold wind coming in from the Thames
I hate going to Palace and Everton and Bournemouth( despite its being a new stadium it’s too small ) and I hate Stamford Bridge
I judge a stadium on ease of access , and view point and atmosphere created by the Away fans , for that it’s good , better than the Etihad , in three tiers . Newcastle is a great stadium but the viewing is awful , once you get up them stairs .
I’ve always loved Villa Park , great old stadium, and Fulham is great , except in February with the cold wind coming in from the Thames
I hate going to Palace and Everton and Bournemouth( despite its being a new stadium it’s too small ) and I hate Stamford Bridge
You’re calling Dean Court, a stadium opened in 1910, new?
OK.
Now I’m convinced you know what you’re talking about.
Please tell me you didn't award whl or nwhl if that's really what you're calling it many points for ease of access, its a fucking bitch to get to, by far the worse stadium in London to get to. Perhaps Palace could give it a run for most fans, but even that's relatively easy for me. :-)
What's this "we unlike City" quotes, we heard you the first time, you've no need to repeat it 3 times, btw you beat our transfer record the other day, so your club isn't short of money as you make out.
How much was nDembele ?
Far too much is made of this, IMO.
It has one London overground station less than 5 minutes from the stadium; another that is 10 minutes away; one tube station that is 20 minutes from the stadium; and another that is 25 minutes. Not to mention countless buses.
In fact, there's a third overground station that has just opened at Meridian Water, no more than 15 minutes away.
Maybe not as good as some other London stadiums but hardly a "bitch to get to".
I'am sure I am not alone but I measure accessibility to a ground from how long\easy it is to get to after getting of the train at the main station, The swamp 20 min on tram, Anfield/Goodison 10 mins taxi, St Marys, 10 min walk, St James 15 min walk, Etihad, 10-15 min walk, Carrow road 10 min walk, dean court 10 min shuttle bus.
So by comparison even allowing for the London factor the 60-90 mins on Match day from/to Euston and 2/3/4 changes plus some walking makes whl a relative bitch to get to. I'll give that you probably have multiple alternatives for the locals but for away fans its got to rank as shite to get to and away from.
Hopefully I'll be doing the weekend in London thing for it this season and sky wont butcher the fixtures and move to Monday night.
CE Can be fantastic , but his corners are beyond shit he never beats his first man , his free kicks are pretty awful to9 . He scored against Everton on the last day of the season , the previous goal from a free-kick ,was away v Juve in the CL the previous season . He does however run a lot and create chances and we are better with him than without as he’s rarely injured .
It must be galling for him to be on only 70k a week when Lindgard is on over 100k and Ozil is on 350 ,Ramsey on over 200 and Hazzard 250+ .....all DO has to do is offer 150 k and back date for 2 years , and he’ll stay and will only cost 50m ish , which would be a bargain
Well we’ve got NDembele and Clarke and it’s pretty strong that we are getting the Sessengnon twins and possible Ceballos on loan , we unlike City can’t afford a buy out clause of 80m for Celso
60-90 minutes to get to White Hart Lane from Euston? What route are you taking?!! From Euston, it’s a mere 4-5 stops and 15-20 minutes up the Victoria Line to Seven Sisters or Tottenham Hale. A walk from the former is a further 25 minutes, or 20 minutes for the latter. Alternatively, change for the Overground at Seven Sisters and it’s max a 10 minute wait followed by a 5 minute ride to WHL.
In many ways it doesn't matter to me; although I don't mind Spurs (I'd probably choose them over any of the other remaining 'top 6') I'm not going to lose sleep over what I perceive to be Spur's fans getting shafted by the owners, but I'm surprised there isn't more skepticism. Maybe you should look at the discussion in the Arsenal thread (yes, I know, Arsenal) about their finances and reflect on what they were told for years.
Difference is that, unlike Arsenal fans, we’re not being sold the lie that the new stadium will limit Spurs’ ability to operate in the transfer market. The promise and expectation is that the club can now kick on and show greater ambition. I don’t think many people have cottoned on to what a game changer the new stadium is for Spurs. This is not a bog standard new stadium. From a financial perspective, it is cast from an altogether different mould. It will generate in excess of £100m more per annum than the old stadium generated. I would estimate that that is at least double the likely annual interest and repayment costs.
It's a piece of piss getting to WHL. As JimB says there are a multitude of tube/overground stations in the area. Not as quick as Arsenal sure, but it's not difficult at all.Please tell me you didn't award whl or nwhl if that's really what you're calling it many points for ease of access, its a fucking bitch to get to, by far the worse stadium in London to get to. Perhaps Palace could give it a run for most fans, but even that's relatively easy for me. :-)
So there will be no excuse for Levy to come out with the usual reasons why you haven’t bought any players?