BlueRockape
Well-Known Member
It will probably go to off field activities debt on the ground and such things.
It's either that or the daft rags are stumping up 150 mill for Arry
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Spurs Thread - 2021/22
- Thread starter MAG
- Start date
It's either that or the daft rags are stumping up 150 mill for Arry
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 60,074
So why don’t all clubs who have owners who want to invest do that?It will probably go to off field activities debt on the ground and such things.
It's either that or the daft rags are stumping up 150 mill for Arry
I've no issue with it but I bet they don't get the same criticism we get for spending.
Quite the opposite, they will be praised for it
Because it essentially doesn't make any difference to ffp, they still have to spend what they earn plus the allowed losses.So why don’t all clubs who have owners who want to invest do that?
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 60,074
Ok, so what use does injecting £150m into Spurs actually do?Because it doesn't make any difference to ffp, they still have to spend what they earn plus the allowed losses.
Ok, so what use does injecting £150m into Spurs actually do?
They can use it to their advantage by paying more upfront to secure a signing cheaper or as a better proposal than another club who may want to sign the same player but want the cost spread over 5 years.
They could pay off debts which were incurring interest.
They could use it for thing which don't come under ffp like stadium improvements.
We have done it numerous times under Sheikh Mansour, he has always turned the loans into equity. Ambramovic did it at Chelsea but left them as loans.
Manc in London
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 Aug 2008
- Messages
- 8,502
Levy making promises to a manager again and likely to not deliver again. Maybe he will change and sign a player before the season starts rather than look to save on wages during the post-season.
Not saying it is highly likely but I honestly would not be surprised if Conte left at some point before September. He is a good manager who deserves to be at a bigger club.
Makes sense to invest as they are in 'win now' mode for two or three years while Kane can still play at the top level.
Not saying it is highly likely but I honestly would not be surprised if Conte left at some point before September. He is a good manager who deserves to be at a bigger club.
Makes sense to invest as they are in 'win now' mode for two or three years while Kane can still play at the top level.
M
M
mat
Guest
That's £150 paid for Rashford then...
brian the blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 19 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 1,436
I've no issue with it but I bet they don't get the same criticism we get for spending.
Surely not the wisest transfer strategy? Publicly stating you’ve got a lot of money to spend.
Something I’d like to know along with an average contribution from Abramovich of circa 45m since he took over Chelsea.How is it possible within FFP?