Chippy_boy
Well-Known Member
Add to that the National Program for IT for the NHS. Canned when costs spiralled to £10bn.Fundamentally those arguing to increase taxes are just rubber stamping a continuation of the same old. They're basically saying that currently everything is fine as it is but it's just underfunded. However that's not always true, it's instead true that the money we do spend doesn't actually get spent on building stuff or running services.
Trains for example aren't complicated. A train runs on a railway line and all it has to do is turn up at a certain place at a certain time and then it moves to the next place. How can this system not work properly and how can it not have worked properly for years? Many will jump on me and say well this is because of profiteering but that isn't necessarily true, it's actually just a lazy argument.
Northern was taken into public ownership 3 years ago but what's changed? My local train station is operated by Northern, it always had a free car park and from December they're now charging us £2 per day for the privilege. They've decided to do this no not in January but at the busiest time of the year for a key line into Manchester, surprise!
The state of this country is if we decided upon a massive spending infrastructure revolution then you can bet that we'd spend most of the money on consultants and lawyers. The actual building and running part would be allocated the dregs at the bottom and after 10-20 years of delays we'd probably come to realise that actually we can't afford it.
HS2 has just been found out on that given they've cancelled the Manchester element of the line. What sums it up though is nobody has questioned how the hell can a 100 mile railway line cost 2-5% of GDP of the 6th largest economy in the world.
The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) calls the saga one of the “worst and most expensive contracting fiascos” in public sector history, and adds: “Although the Department told us that the National Programme had been dismantled, the component programmes are all continuing, the existing contracts are being honoured and significant costs are still being incurred. The only change from the National Programme that the Department could tell us about was that new governance arrangements were now in place.”
The estimated costs of the scheme rose from £6.4bn to £9.8bn, but ongoing costs arising from legal battles and other issues will keep dragging this figure higher, the MP said, especially the price of terminating the Fujitsu contract in the south of England, and the ongoing costs of Lorenzo in the north, Midlands and east.