Before the game Steaua were settled well into their season going well, top of their League, undefeated, a couple of very dangerous players (Rromanian Internationals a plenty)and a team we should be respectful of because of their pedigree in the competition, difficult to play against particularly in Romania with a good record against English teams.
After we dismantled them they were a shit Doncaster Rovers according to the press. A bit like Club Brugge were last year in the press remember!
Here see if you can spot the section referring to Brugge as shite -
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/34058082
BBC commentary of City game:
"It's hard to read too much tactically with regards to Pep Guardiola in this game as Manchester City won't face many worse sides all season than Steaua Bucharest."
"With all due respect to Romanian football,i very much doubt this team would avoid relegation if they played in the Premier League"
"Steaua are defending like it's the last five minutes of five-a-side and you're just thinking of getting home for a beer."
"I wonder if City will use a few kids next week. Steaua just aren't very good, surely it's a good chance to give them minutes"
"Steaua manager Laurentiu Reghecampf gives his players a team talk on the pitch afterwards. His side were shocking...."
I don't necessarily disagree with commentary facts just the unbalanced nature of the reporting.....am I being a bit touchy?
I also know the performance on Tue wont be any kind of acid test and there are tougher tasks ahead.