Sterling’s contract - three year extension confirmed

If he had moved to us and there wasn't the hate campaign by the media and pundits he would get the credit,it's like it's totally sunk into peoples heads that he is not good enough because everyone at every ground boo him,mp ruined his first season as he took away all his flair so you can write off that season,he has flourished under pep,he is now full of confidence and scoring and assisting,he has come along nicely,watch england sap his confidence as usual,hate them for that
Well said Kaz: )
 
I listened to a sad scouser the other day rant on talkshite. His sole purpose was to say Sterling wasn't a world class player, he didn't last long before they cut the sad **** off. Well if isn't world class yet la, he will be before too long. Not for 'yoos' dippers, for us, where he is winning trophies and getting better and better. lt is plain to see for anyone without hate and bias that Sterling is going to become an outstanding player.
 
With the 713 match day cameras all focussed on him I hope he runs rings round the rag bus and bags a hat trick in a masterclass of City domination
 
Their is no exscuse for the condsending comments that went Karens way though, discuss and dissagree but be civil.
I'm in favor of civil discourse - but I can stand only so much.

So - I offer this lame excuse - it's tit-for-tat - and I was not the instigator.

My original post - for which Karen attacked me - wasn't even critical of Sterling. I merely remarked that Sterling can improve his game even more - that, in my opinion, he's Balon Dior material but lack of confidence is holding him back - and that in the national squad, his manager doesn't seem to be doing nearly as well as Pep boosting his confidence.
===
But all of the above is moot - I've put Karen on ignore and she supposedly has done the same.
===
As to your suggestion that I'm a misogynist - supposedly being surprised that I didn't make some sort of "back to the kitchen" remark - well, then, you're far worse than I - and your post is at best misguided - or is simply hypocrisy.

I've gone out of my way to be civil to Karen - to no avail whatsoever. Karen is locked into her beliefs and is immediately on the attack when opinions are expressed that she disagrees with - which is not a fault.

What's at fault is that she doesn't stop at attacking those opinions - what's bad is that she invariably launches into an attack on character.

I avoided attacking her character for quite some time - but eventually gave up.

I think that Karen is a right f... well, I'll stop there.
===
Thinking about her attacks on me, initially I thought she was a xenophobe - but, I think that this is actually off the mark.

Karen simply cannot abide any criticism of her beliefs whatsoever. Especially by those whom she does not hold in regard.

To her credit, she has the capacity to eventually change her mind on issues - but I've never seen her attenuate disrespect of those who have expressed opinions opposite to hers.
 
Last edited:
No idea why or how but you quoted me and then you replaced my contents with someone elses bud.


So - I offer this lame excuse - it's tit-for-tat - and I was not the instigator.

You're right, that's lame.

As to your suggestion that I'm a misogynist - supposedly being surprised that I didn't make some sort of "back to the kitchen" remark - well, then, you're far worse than I - and your post is at best misguided - or is simply hypocrisy.

So you think I'm a misogynist because I called you out on it? Even lamer.

Thinking about her attacks on me, initially I thought she was a xenophobe - but, I think that this is actually off the mark.

Lol, you're playing the racist card now. Wow, if you were a horse they'd shoot you.

Reason for edit: 1st sentence didn't make much sense :(
 
Last edited:
I'm in favor of civil discourse - but I can stand only so much.

So - I offer this lame excuse - it's tit-for-tat - and I was not the instigator.

My original post - for which Karen attacked me - wasn't even critical of Sterling. I merely remarked that Sterling can improve his game even more - that, in my opinion, he's Balon Dior material but lack of confidence is holding him back - and that in the national squad, his manager doesn't seem to be doing nearly as well as Pep boosting his confidence.
===
But all of the above is moot - I've put Karen on ignore and she supposedly has done the same.
===
As to your suggestion that I'm a misogynist - supposedly being surprised that I didn't make some sort of "back to the kitchen" remark - well, then, you're far worse than I - and your post is at best misguided - or is simply hypocrisy.

I've gone out of my way to be civil to Karen - to no avail whatsoever. Karen is locked into her beliefs and is immediately on the attack when opinions are expressed that she disagrees with - which is not a fault.

What's at fault is that she doesn't stop at attacking those opinions - what's bad is that she invariably launches into an attack on character.

I avoided attacking her character for quite some time - but eventually gave up.

I think that Karen is a right f... well, I'll stop there.
===
Thinking about her attacks on me, initially I thought she was a xenophobe - but, I think that this is actually off the mark.

Karen simply cannot abide any criticism of her beliefs whatsoever. Especially by those whom she does not hold in regard.

To her credit, she has the capacity to eventually change her mind on issues - but I've never seen her attenuate disrespect of those who have expressed opinions opposite to hers.
Oh my days what a bubble you live in
 
I'm in favor of civil discourse - but I can stand only so much.

So - I offer this lame excuse - it's tit-for-tat - and I was not the instigator.

My original post - for which Karen attacked me - wasn't even critical of Sterling. I merely remarked that Sterling can improve his game even more - that, in my opinion, he's Balon Dior material but lack of confidence is holding him back - and that in the national squad, his manager doesn't seem to be doing nearly as well as Pep boosting his confidence.
===
But all of the above is moot - I've put Karen on ignore and she supposedly has done the same.
===
As to your suggestion that I'm a misogynist - supposedly being surprised that I didn't make some sort of "back to the kitchen" remark - well, then, you're far worse than I - and your post is at best misguided - or is simply hypocrisy.

I've gone out of my way to be civil to Karen - to no avail whatsoever. Karen is locked into her beliefs and is immediately on the attack when opinions are expressed that she disagrees with - which is not a fault.

What's at fault is that she doesn't stop at attacking those opinions - what's bad is that she invariably launches into an attack on character.

I avoided attacking her character for quite some time - but eventually gave up.

I think that Karen is a right f... well, I'll stop there.
===
Thinking about her attacks on me, initially I thought she was a xenophobe - but, I think that this is actually off the mark.

Karen simply cannot abide any criticism of her beliefs whatsoever. Especially by those whom she does not hold in regard.

To her credit, she has the capacity to eventually change her mind on issues - but I've never seen her attenuate disrespect of those who have expressed opinions opposite to hers.
f...?
Feisty?
Flirtatious?
Frisky?
Foxy?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.