You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Stevie G Innocent!
- Thread starter ColinBall
- Start date
BlueSinclair
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Oct 2007
- Messages
- 1,774
Good call, im glad he was ruled innocent.
jimmy grummble
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 157
Now this is over can we sign him???
Keke Rosberg
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 308
Utter bollocks,
Stevie G’s main argument was he landed his punches in self defence because he thought he was going to be attacked first. Now that sounds fair enough, I mean that can happen some guy right in front of you looking threatening, eye contact etc etc
But
the guy is sat down in the corner of the bar minding his own business when SG took it upon him to enter his space. Next he’s getting elbowed and twated from SG and his mates. Even if SG had looked away (bollocks) and missed the elbow blow to the face, CCTV proved beyond doubt the guy was hardly in a position to threaten or squire up with eye contact, he could be clearly seen bent head down in shock before SG landed his cowards punches.
Absolute and utter bollocks,
the only good that come of this is if we forget about Terry and Lescott and just sign up SG’s defence team.
Stevie G’s main argument was he landed his punches in self defence because he thought he was going to be attacked first. Now that sounds fair enough, I mean that can happen some guy right in front of you looking threatening, eye contact etc etc
But
the guy is sat down in the corner of the bar minding his own business when SG took it upon him to enter his space. Next he’s getting elbowed and twated from SG and his mates. Even if SG had looked away (bollocks) and missed the elbow blow to the face, CCTV proved beyond doubt the guy was hardly in a position to threaten or squire up with eye contact, he could be clearly seen bent head down in shock before SG landed his cowards punches.
Absolute and utter bollocks,
the only good that come of this is if we forget about Terry and Lescott and just sign up SG’s defence team.
scousemanc
Well-Known Member
jimmy grummble said:Now this is over can we sign him???
So we can add "Mr Liverpool" to "Mr Chelsea" and "Mr Villa"
jimharri
Moderator
Not possible. If somebody played a Phil Collins "record", there'd be murder!!Biginoil said:I just read (in the Guardian, so it's a FACT) that the dispute was over a Phil Collins record.
Showed my age there, didn't I!jimharri said:Not possible. If somebody played a Phil Collins "record", there'd be murder!!Biginoil said:I just read (in the Guardian, so it's a FACT) that the dispute was over a Phil Collins record.
I'm sure it was an MP3 or summat.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2009/jul/24/steven-gerrard-incident-reveals-footballers-lives
And people wonder why the UK is going to the dogs?
The legal system has just pronounced that this type of behaviour is acceptable. As a tax payer, in the current economic climate, I would be asking serious questions as to why the prosecutor should be allowed to continue sucking the tit of society. That statement was outrageous!
You get the society you deserve. What is it going to take for people to start wrestling their society back from these wankers?
The legal system has just pronounced that this type of behaviour is acceptable. As a tax payer, in the current economic climate, I would be asking serious questions as to why the prosecutor should be allowed to continue sucking the tit of society. That statement was outrageous!
You get the society you deserve. What is it going to take for people to start wrestling their society back from these wankers?
And people wonder why the UK is going to the dogs?
The legal system has just pronounced that this type of behaviour is acceptable. As a tax payer, in the current economic climate, I would be asking serious questions as to why the prosecutor should be allowed to continue sucking the tit of society. That statement was outrageous!
You get the society you deserve. What is it going to take for people to start wrestling their society back from these wankers?
The legal system has just pronounced that this type of behaviour is acceptable. As a tax payer, in the current economic climate, I would be asking serious questions as to why the prosecutor should be allowed to continue sucking the tit of society. That statement was outrageous!
You get the society you deserve. What is it going to take for people to start wrestling their society back from these wankers?