Stoke post match

Its painful sometimes. The basis for it not being a penalty on here is it wont be consistently given or it wont be given against United. Not sure how many more times it can be explained.

I'm not arguing they aren't penalties. What i am saying, is there have been a few more incidents today and are being totally ignored.
I don't call that a clampdown, by referees. So instead of trying to belittle people with the painful and hard to understand remarks,
maybe you should read what people post.
 
And of course it fucking matters if it's not being implemented elsewhere.
Course it matters. Why wouldn't it matter? It's just the integrity of the competition that's at stake if it isn't applied across the board, that's all. And the people saying it wouldn't be given against the rags are spot on.
 
Fuck me, not you as well. Do you actually, in all seriousness think Sky made it up? Really?

And no, it fucking doesn't matter if it isn't applied anywhere else. Since when has that mattered? I'm guessing you've been on the drink, or you've had your first domestic!
Neither and see my reply above.
 
So the back pass rules comes in. It's a new rule. But it's only applied in matches containing Mike Dean and/or Man City, and that isn't a problem.

It's not people being thick, it's you have the empathetic ability of a wank sock.
Fucking hell, are you sat at home with a tin foil hat on?

In fact, I think you're on the wum actually, as I know you're not this fucking inherently stupid.
 
Fuck me, not you as well. Do you actually, in all seriousness think Sky made it up? Really?

And no, it fucking doesn't matter if it isn't applied anywhere else. Since when has that mattered? I'm guessing you've been on the drink, or you've had your first domestic!
So it's not written down anywhere?

You forget I go on the piss with these "experts" that are on football panels out here when they are on the Bein payroll.

So yes, I fully could get behind certain points being exaggerated to fit the script.
 
Christ, you lot are fucking hard work tonight. There's a collective IQ meltdown akin to Ragcaf.
 
It's amazing how more structured we look after 3 games and we're attacking and defending as a unit with more fluidity. Yet last year and for the last year under Mancini, one of my gripes was that we looked too structured and this was affecting our ability to shift the ball quickly. Players are interchanging much more now so if for example, Stones goes forward, Dinho immediately covers for him.

Not stalking you btw ;)

We do and its all about Peps philosophy. The team attacking in a structured way which ensures we always have two options to pass to, in close proximity, and if we lose it we can quickly counter press in numbers as those same players will be in close proximity to win the ball back.

That is the beauty of having KDB and Silva playing just off the front three, they will always offer support to the forward players and be the players who will play the decisive ball, our most tecnical players, and be facing the oppositions goal. The experts call them the interiors. No worries no injunction applied for just yet.
 
So it's not written down anywhere?

You forget I go on the piss with these "experts" that are on football panels out here when they are on the Bein payroll.

So yes, I fully could get behind certain points being exaggerated to fit the script.
So Sky are lying?
 
I asked "the back pass rule comes in and is only implemented in games involving Mike Dean and/or Man City, does that still not matter?"

It's fairly straightforward.
No, it's childish and nonsensical.
 
No, it's childish and nonsensical.
Because you know the answer would be "well yes that would matter"

Which then nullifies your presumption that just one corner adhering to the "new rules" from a full day of football isn't a problem.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top