Ducado
Well-Known Member
Re: Suarez
Good Player, vile human being! And not really a good PR image for any club he plays for
Good Player, vile human being! And not really a good PR image for any club he plays for
Ducado said:Good Player, vile human being! And not really a good PR image for any club he plays for
mancity5 said:The **** cries at everything.....
What other justification can there be? He was the highest scoring midfielder by a long margin, and managed third overall. He also managed to do so in important games, whilst Suarez was busy being anonymous. He was also responsible for getting us into some remarkable positions in games. He contributed the best attributes of Suarez, Gerrard and Sterling with his goals, passes and runs. It's Yaya's opinion that race played a big part in the voting and it's also mine. If he had been called Yaya Turner he would have been POTY.bluemoon32 said:Yaya didn't win POTY due to the colour of his skin????
Sorry but that's absolute bollocks
Irwell said:Not really. His main job is to score goals for his team. He was highest scorer by fluke caused by injuries to his competitors combined with circumstances with his team that meant rotation was not needed. Aguero scored a goal every 75 minutes he played whilst Suarez was over 100. Yaya had a better season than Suarez and would have won POTY but for the colour of his skin, whilst Aguero would have been the top striker in the league but for injury. Suarez barely made the top 5 in the league based on the number of minutes he played for every goal he scored, a fairly key metric for a striker, and he had a habit of going missing during the important games. The simple fact is that they didn't play in Europe and had short cup runs, reducing the need for rotation, which meant he had more playing time to score league goals. No doubt a good player, but I think he wasn't deserving of POTY over Yaya.sir baconface said:is deservedly POTY in one of the best leagues