samharris said:
Brendan Rogers giving it the big one about Suarez and his lack of loyalty in todays papers(ssn)..
papers then go on ta talk about Rogers lack of loyalty to his previous club before he went to Reading..
Anyone who thinks suarez has got one loyal bone in his body needs to go to the deluded clinic.
That's quality. Thing is, when you think about it there's very little loyalty in football these days but plenty of hypocrisy (as evidenced by Rodgers and his comments). Of course, I'll add that this isn't just confined to Rodgers and Liverpool Football Club.
Rodgers also spoke about doing things the "Liverpool Way" with integrity, etc. Well, if (I say if because it wouldn't surprise me if Suarez is lying of course) it turns out that Suarez does have a clause in his contract allowing him to leave for a certain amount if Liverpool didn't get into the top 4 and Liverpool are trying to renege on that, does that equate to the "Liverpool Way" and doing things with integrity Brendan?
Loyalty works both ways in football and while it's normally the players that get the stick, the fact is that clubs are often happy to get rid of players if they've had their use out of them or they don't live up to expectations. In this instance, Suarez is clearly a quality player so Liverpool are loathe to let him go (understandable of course) but Stewart Downing, who has proved to be mediocre for them so far, is clearly not in their future plans so they're keen to offload him.
