Suck It and See - Arctic Monkeys: review.

8.6 is high praise indeed. I'm still refusing to listen to it until I have a hard copy in my hand. I'm like that.

I'd rather see you give a rating out of 5 stars rather than 10 and going in to all the decimal points. I don't find it really works with a review unless it is people voting and averaging it out, ala IMDb.

However, keep up the reviewing.
 
simonr555 said:
8.6 is high praise indeed. I'm still refusing to listen to it until I have a hard copy in my hand. I'm like that.

I'd rather see you give a rating out of 5 stars rather than 10 and going in to all the decimal points. I don't find it really works with a review unless it is people voting and averaging it out, ala IMDb.

However, keep up the reviewing.
Click to expand...
I work it out with my own little maths game.

"I give a score out of 10 for overall song quality, vocal quality, lyrical quality, instrumentation quality and the impact it had on me when I listened to it."

For this album, the scores added up to 43/50. I then divide by 10, so that give me 4.3/5. I then double that and it adds up to 8.6/10 :)
 
MCFC BOB said:
simonr555 said:
8.6 is high praise indeed. I'm still refusing to listen to it until I have a hard copy in my hand. I'm like that.

I'd rather see you give a rating out of 5 stars rather than 10 and going in to all the decimal points. I don't find it really works with a review unless it is people voting and averaging it out, ala IMDb.

However, keep up the reviewing.
Click to expand...
I work it out with my own little maths game.

"I give a score out of 10 for overall song quality, vocal quality, lyrical quality, instrumentation quality and the impact it had on me when I listened to it."

For this album, the scores added up to 43/50. I then divide by 10, so that give me 4.3/5. I then double that and it adds up to 8.6/10 :)
Click to expand...

Why not just divide the original score by 5?!
 
Although I dont care for the albums your reviewing. I have to say your doing a good job. there could be a future in this mate!
 
Ric said:
MCFC BOB said:
simonr555 said:
8.6 is high praise indeed. I'm still refusing to listen to it until I have a hard copy in my hand. I'm like that.

I'd rather see you give a rating out of 5 stars rather than 10 and going in to all the decimal points. I don't find it really works with a review unless it is people voting and averaging it out, ala IMDb.

However, keep up the reviewing.
Click to expand...
I work it out with my own little maths game.

"I give a score out of 10 for overall song quality, vocal quality, lyrical quality, instrumentation quality and the impact it had on me when I listened to it."

For this album, the scores added up to 43/50. I then divide by 10, so that give me 4.3/5. I then double that and it adds up to 8.6/10 :)
Click to expand...

Why not just divide the original score by 5?!
Click to expand...
I'm not a mathematician. Haha.
 
MCFC BOB said:
Ric said:
MCFC BOB said:
I work it out with my own little maths game.

"I give a score out of 10 for overall song quality, vocal quality, lyrical quality, instrumentation quality and the impact it had on me when I listened to it."

For this album, the scores added up to 43/50. I then divide by 10, so that give me 4.3/5. I then double that and it adds up to 8.6/10 :)
Click to expand...

Why not just divide the original score by 5?!
Click to expand...
I'm not a mathematician. Haha.
Click to expand...

Clearly ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.