Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 60,007
Need to stay clear of Lewis though, his sidekick was a bit of a loose cannon.
Last edited:
Definitely if they are perceived as being a Tory tool. Well according to most threads on here they should be apolitical.
My guess is being politicised is fine so long as you agree with it.
Suppose we are all guilty of holding and showing such bias though.
Dave Ewing's Back 'eader
Well-Known Member
Oh, no thanks. Some of the stuff I endured during the 64/65 season was traumatic. I'm only coming out of the tunnel intact.
crazyg
Well-Known Member
Be great to see crowds of 8015 again.
I think she should be given a chance - she is right on this:
Urgent overhaul planned for Prevent which is ‘protecting terrorists and not the public’
Official inquiry finds the counter-terrorism scheme is also too focused on Right-wing extremism and not the ‘lethal threat from Islamism’
www.telegraph.co.uk
"Suella Braverman is planning an urgent overhaul of the Government’s counter-extremism programme after an official inquiry concluded Prevent was treating potential terrorists as “victims”."
I have had 'prevent training' in my work and it vexed me. The speaker would talk about something involving a certain religion, but then immediately bring up something like the Thomas Mair/Jo Cox murder, to make the scales balance. They do not.
Suella Braverman: New home secretary given long list of demands after Priti Patel
Priti Patel’s successor ‘must not repeat mistakes of the past again and again’, groups warn
www.independent.co.uk
Is important too, but how come PP who seemed to be so divisive has left a "....lengthy list of demands"?
Could it be the left-leaning (& pro-remain) civil servants in the Westminister bubble, dragged their feet deliberately - and what is to stop them doing the same again for this new woman?
This bit puzzles me though: "Suella Braverman takes her post as the legality of the government’s agreement to forcibly send asylum seekers to Rwanda is examined by the High Court." I thought the Rwanda scheme had passed successfully through every court in the land and its enactment only stopped by the ECHR, so why are the High court examining its 'legality'?
She is also right on this Police issue too. My dad is retired Manchester Police person, he was raging when the police stood by as vandals toppled an Edward Colston statue into Bristol harbour. Don't get me started on what he said when the culprits were tracked down later (well they were all over social media) charged, put up in court and then found 'not guilty' of criminal damage! The country made to look foolish, by lefty lawyers, yet again.
Last edited:
aguero93:20
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Oct 2013
- Messages
- 90,256
- Location
- Hunting Cats.
- Team supported
- Some gobshites in day-glo green and black.
It's the crowds of 12,345 I want to see back.
urban genie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 11 May 2008
- Messages
- 32,623
Coppers can be both if funded and staffed properly.
Of course we need the police to be responders to any crime and not just a crime number over the phone and you fobbed off as not a serious crime, but they can also be actively part of the community and and get invioved in events around the diverse communities and cultures.
Of course we need the police to be responders to any crime and not just a crime number over the phone and you fobbed off as not a serious crime, but they can also be actively part of the community and and get invioved in events around the diverse communities and cultures.
Last edited:
denislawsbackheel
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 May 2008
- Messages
- 26,084
- Team supported
- We went to Rotherham…
Pollock.I think she should be given a chance - she is right on this:
Urgent overhaul planned for Prevent which is ‘protecting terrorists and not the public’
Official inquiry finds the counter-terrorism scheme is also too focused on Right-wing extremism and not the ‘lethal threat from Islamism’
"Suella Braverman is planning an urgent overhaul of the Government’s counter-extremism programme after an official inquiry concluded Prevent was treating potential terrorists as “victims”."
I have had 'prevent training' in my work and it vexed me. The speaker would talk about something involving a certain religion, but then immediately bring up something like the Thomas Mair/Jo Cox murder, to make the scales balance. They do not.
Suella Braverman: New home secretary given long list of demands after Priti Patel
Priti Patel’s successor ‘must not repeat mistakes of the past again and again’, groups warn
Is important too, but how come PP who seemed to be so divisive has left a "....lengthy list of demands"?
Could it be the left-leaning (& pro-remain) civil servants in the Westminister bubble, dragged their feet deliberately - and what is to stop them doing the same again for this new woman?
This bit puzzles me though: "Suella Braverman takes her post as the legality of the government’s agreement to forcibly send asylum seekers to Rwanda is examined by the High Court." I thought the Rwanda scheme had passed successfully through every court in the land and its enactment only stopped by the ECHR, so why are the High court examining its 'legality'?
She is also right on this Police issue too. My dad is retired Manchester Police person, he was raging when the police stood by as vandals toppled an Edward Colston statue into Bristol harbour. Don't get me started on what he said when the culprits were tracked down later (well they were all over social media) charged, put up in court and then found 'not guilty' of criminal damage! The country made to look foolish, by lefty lawyers, yet again.
Juries decided, not lawyers.
Fixed the last sentence.I think she should be given a chance - she is right on this:
Urgent overhaul planned for Prevent which is ‘protecting terrorists and not the public’
Official inquiry finds the counter-terrorism scheme is also too focused on Right-wing extremism and not the ‘lethal threat from Islamism’
"Suella Braverman is planning an urgent overhaul of the Government’s counter-extremism programme after an official inquiry concluded Prevent was treating potential terrorists as “victims”."
I have had 'prevent training' in my work and it vexed me. The speaker would talk about something involving a certain religion, but then immediately bring up something like the Thomas Mair/Jo Cox murder, to make the scales balance. They do not.
Suella Braverman: New home secretary given long list of demands after Priti Patel
Priti Patel’s successor ‘must not repeat mistakes of the past again and again’, groups warn
Is important too, but how come PP who seemed to be so divisive has left a "....lengthy list of demands"?
Could it be the left-leaning (& pro-remain) civil servants in the Westminister bubble, dragged their feet deliberately - and what is to stop them doing the same again for this new woman?
This bit puzzles me though: "Suella Braverman takes her post as the legality of the government’s agreement to forcibly send asylum seekers to Rwanda is examined by the High Court." I thought the Rwanda scheme had passed successfully through every court in the land and its enactment only stopped by the ECHR, so why are the High court examining its 'legality'?
She is also right on this Police issue too. My dad is retired Manchester Police person, he was raging when the police stood by as vandals toppled an Edward Colston statue into Bristol harbour. Don't get me started on what he said when the culprits were tracked down later (well they were all over social media) charged, put up in court and then found 'not guilty' of criminal damage! The country made to look enlightened, by a jury who understood the bigger picture, yet again.
EL APACHE TEVEZ
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Sep 2008
- Messages
- 21,979
It all went to pot when Jack Regan retired