Sunday Supplement 17/18

Curtis was saying City might be playing well ..... but they’re not the first to do it .... “look at United back in 2000 and 2001 they had the league won by December then” ....!!!!!

So I did look at it and ...
December 1999 ....... rags 2nd to Leeds
December 2000 ....... rags 1st 8 points ahead
December 2001 ........ rags 5th to Newcastle
December 2002 ....... rags 2nd to Arsenal

So Custis seems to have a memory or fact retention issue but if you keep telling a lie it becomes a fact
 
portisheadblue said:
Curtis was saying City might be playing well ..... but they’re not the first to do it .... “look at United back in 2000 and 2001 they had the league won by December then” ....!!!!!

So I did look at it and ...
December 1999 ....... rags 2nd to Leeds
December 2000 ....... rags 1st 8 points ahead
December 2001 ........ rags 5th to Newcastle
December 2002 ....... rags 2nd to Arsenal

So Custis seems to have a memory or fact retention issue but if you keep telling a lie it becomes a fact
Click to expand...

Yep, it's now the perceived "truth" that West Ham were unlucky against us.
 
stock-photo-fat-slug-crawling-on-aged-wood-spanish-slug-arion-vulgaris-invasion-in-garden-invasive-slug-591199460.jpg
 
What did we expect. Two biased reporters on the rag payroll! There job is to talk to united fans who read their stories. They did balance it by saying we played good football... oh how they hurt
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.