Allnightlong
Well-Known Member
Didnt really go for the jugular due to a message sent out by city. Shit scared of alledging things imo
Exactly fucking pricks.They said it is not a witch hunt against City in the basis that there are more documents in the football leaks book about United than City.
So why has there been nothing in the media about them?
Didnt really go for the jugular due to a message sent out by city. Shit scared of alledging things imo
They said it is not a witch hunt against City in the basis that there are more documents in the football leaks book about United than City.
So why has there been nothing in the media about them?
I haven't even heard of a book, let alone anything about other clubs.
It did come over as restrained, but not as if constrained by instruction. Quite surprised by Rory Smith (NY Times), who was solid. Draper seemed to have a completely different stance to his Mail piece, and even admitted there was an element that they were a stitch-up by other clubs in the first place - he came over as quite rational too.
The impression is that UEFA's investigation isn't a big issue. Interesting that Ashton 'was asked by City' to reiterate the clubs statement on legality.
All very odd.
Very afraid of litigation threats I hope, City have hopefully made it known we will take false comments and allegations seriouslyMust admit I thought they'd be pretty ruthless, wasn't that bad.
They said it is not a witch hunt against City in the basis that there are more documents in the football leaks book about United than City.
So why has there been nothing in the media about them?