Sunday's Games 20/1/2013

chesterbells said:
AntiUnited said:
JoeMercer'sWay said:
red card all day long, bottle job atkinson.


erm the goalie didnt even touch him he fell in the same motion as the keeper properly coned the reff

That's right. Tbh, he looked like he wasn't sure what to do so falling for a pen gave the job to someone else.
Arsenal are making Chelsea look good. Bring on Swansea for a real test for them

once you give the penalty it's a red card all day long. You either give a dive or penalty and red card.
 
chesterbells said:
AntiUnited said:
JoeMercer'sWay said:
red card all day long, bottle job atkinson.


erm the goalie didnt even touch him he fell in the same motion as the keeper properly coned the reff

That's right. Tbh, he looked like he wasn't sure what to do so falling for a pen gave the job to someone else.
Arsenal are making Chelsea look good. Bring on Swansea for a real test for them

from the normal match cam view it looks clear cut pen but like u said proper con job (or he just slipped)
 
Only thing with Chelsea is their tendency to be brittle. Hence letting a 2 nil lead slip against Southampton.
 
Seosa said:
To think that we spent £24m on Nasri while Chelsea bought Mata for £23.5m is quite sickening tbh.

Same applies to spending £27m on Dzeko when the Rapist cost £22m, but that's another matter.

Chelsea are on form here.

Try to think of it this way.

We spent £37m on Aguero, and Chelsea spent £50m on Torres.

We spent £1m on Hart, the rags spent £17m on De Hahahahaha
 
Seosa said:
To think that we spent £24m on Nasri while Chelsea bought Mata for £23.5m is quite sickening tbh.

Same applies to spending £27m on Dzeko when the Rapist cost £22m, but that's another matter.

Chelsea are on form here.

Chelsea spent 50M on Torres and we a signed Komps for 6M so what's your point?

Some fans are never happy FFS
 
moomba said:
Seosa said:
To think that we spent £24m on Nasri while Chelsea bought Mata for £23.5m is quite sickening tbh.

Same applies to spending £27m on Dzeko when the Rapist cost £22m, but that's another matter.

Chelsea are on form here.

Try to think of it this way.

We spent £37m on Aguero, and Chelsea spent £50m on Torres.

We spent £1m on Hart, the rags spent £17m on De Hahahahaha

And how much for Kompany and Nasty? Or Cliche for that matter.
 
To compare Vinnie with Torres is ridiculous, I was talking about direct comparisons. Moomba's theory was good though.
 
hope the gooners enjoy channel five on thursdays they sold there players at inflated prices to rival clubs who are going for top 4,serves them right 'goodbye arsenal'
 
Seosa said:
To compare Vinnie with Torres is ridiculous, I was talking about direct comparisons. Moomba's theory was good though.

No one was comparing players like for like. We were talking about transfer fees and value for money. Or so I thought.
 
Lets all just laugh at Arsenal and before im accused of being spoilt, rag like or forgetting where we have come from, their fans deserve every fucking thing that comes their way!
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.