Sundays with Laura Kuenssberg

[urban genie]

I see no one is watching it again lol

I watch it every week if up and home, never saw the first couple, and never claimed I wouldn't watch it and sure only My K has so not sure what point you are trying to make each week

 

[urban genie]

It was almost… this is my programme it’s all about me so, I’ll ask a question and then before you get chance to answer I’ll ask another and we’ll carry on like that because it’s my programme. You do know who I am don’t you? I’m Laura K the most important person on the BBC if not the whole of world television

The tory will be allowed to talk shite though - uniterupted

 

[unicorn]

Like or dislike sturgeon that was a shockingly.bad interview from toryK, she woyldn't listen, talled over every answer and didn't seem to be able to handle factual conversation.

Dreadful interviewing.

 

[urban genie]

Seeing Mad Nads early on a sunday morning sober seems sureal, more expect her crashed out on the kitchen floor with several empty bottles of zinfadel laying around

 

[Gabriel]

Like or dislike sturgeon that was a shockingly.bad interview from toryK, she woyldn't listen, talled over every answer and didn't seem to be able to handle factual conversation.

Said before that it often feels as if she’s listening to the editors through her earpiece and not her interviewee, which might be why she keeps asking the next question before the person has answered the previous one. It’s been the same each week irrespective of the politician and stands in mark contrast to when she returns to the panel of pundits.

 

[Looby blue]

I would, does that make me a wrong'un?

 

[urban genie]

I would, does that make me a wrong'un?

On about this mornings show? Do you mean LauraK, Nic Sturgeon? or Nadine Dorris?

 

[Looby blue]

On about this mornings show? Do you mean LauraK, Nic Sturgeon? or Nadine Dorris?

LauraK. I'd rather do it with a sturgeon than with ginger Krankie. Dorries looked like she was melting.

 

[bluethrunthru]

She is exposed in this format like never before. Sweet talking Johnson in a heavily edited 2 minute piece on the 6 0'clock is one thing but spending 10 minutes interviewing someone live shows how poor an interviewer she is - and thats before any bias she brings to the table is factored in. Supposed to be a flagship show but its looking like the high spot was Joe Lycett's piss take in episode 1.

 

[Gabriel]

She is exposed in this format like never before. Sweet talking Johnson in a heavily edited 2 minute piece on the 6 0'clock is one thing but spending 10 minutes interviewing someone live shows how poor an interviewer she is - and thats before any bias she brings to the table is factored in. Supposed to be a flagship show but its looking like the high spot was Joe Lycett's piss take in episode 1.

I think she's also victim of her circumstances. Her prominence on television overlaps almost entirely with this Conservative government (in all its incarnations), which makes it terribly difficult for her to shake off any association. Similarly, the BBC is under pressure to elevate women into prominent roles, so no matter how poorly she performs, she will continue in situ and learn on the job. It might have been better if the BBC had broken the format it had created with Frost/Marr and now Kuenssberg, but Auntie is terribly lazy and wont to change what it has established.

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

I watch it every week if up and home, never saw the first couple, and never claimed I wouldn't watch it and sure only My K has so not sure what point you are trying to make each week

He doesn’t want people to notice how shit the Tories, that he voted for, and how biased Kuenssberg is.

 

[blueinsa]

He doesn’t want people to notice how shit the Tories, that he voted for, and how biased Kuenssberg is.

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

Given someone else has questioned your motive for your weekly post on this thread, why don’t you tell us why you posted It, given the thread wasn‘t even active at the time.

 

[blueinsa]

Given someone else has questioned your motive for your weekly post on this thread, why don’t you tell us why you posted It, given the thread wasn‘t even active at the time.

I could tell you mate but I won’t because for reasons only yourself would know, you have become a bore due to things becoming increasingly personal.

Why I have no idea? We disagree on lots of things obviously although not as much as you would like to pretend or think but that aside, I read your posts with interest and often enjoy them, even if I don’t always agree but of late, posts between ourselves have taken a sour note.

Yet again you refer to me negatively and frankly wrongly in the third person and rather than get involved in the usual to and fro I’ve responded with a video that sums things up as far as I am concerned.

I’ve genuinely no issue with you mate but if you have one with me then fair enough, knock yourself out.

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

I could tell you mate but I won’t because for reasons only yourself would know, you have become a bore due to things becoming increasingly personal.

Why I have no idea? We disagree on lots of things obviously although not as much as you would like to pretend or think but that aside, I read your posts with interest and often enjoy them, even if I don’t always agree but of late, posts between ourselves have taken a sour note.

Yet again you refer to me negatively and frankly wrongly in the third person and rather than get involved in the usual to and fro I’ve responded with a video that sums things up as far as I am concerned.

I’ve genuinely no issue with you mate but if you have one with me then fair enough, knock yourself out.

There’s very few people that I have an issue with on here and I see you as a decent guy with a poor voting record in recent times!

I do find it hard to balance some posts suggesting the current government are utterly shite with you defence of Tory K in here. Maybe it’s simply pulling the leg of a couple of posters that previously said they wouldn’t tune in again and then make a comment about the show a week later, but it does take the emphasis away from the show being mostly a Tory mouthpiece.

Anyhow, I’ll refrain from singling you out, that was unfair on my part and I apologise for that.

 

[blueinsa]

There’s very few people that I have an issue with on here and I see you as a decent guy with a poor voting record in recent times!

I do find it hard to balance some posts suggesting the current government are utterly shite with you defence of Tory K in here. Maybe it’s simply pulling the leg of a couple of posters that previously said they wouldn’t tune in again and then make a comment about the show a week later, but it does take the emphasis away from the show being mostly a Tory mouthpiece.

Anyhow, I’ll refrain from singling you out, that was unfair on my part and I apologise for that.

I don’t defend her.

I tease the same posters who claim she is nothing but a Tory stooge and can’t stand her yet tune in every week so they can tell us all what a Tory stooge she is lol.

We all do it. I go on the VAR thread telling the world it’s a fix yet still watch and you tease us all with a similar reply.

It’s all good blue, life is way too short pal.

 

[mat]

Nice soft interview for the new chancellor tomorrow. I wonder if they'll concoct a new word to replace austerity?

 

[bluethrunthru]

Nice soft interview for the new chancellor tomorrow. I wonder if they'll concoct a new word to replace austerity?

they are already using savings and efficiencies - my Mrs has just done a shift at a Sainsbury's that should have 4 staff but had just two of them - carnage was her description of proceedings not efficient. So extrapolate that to a health service with a 100k plus vacancies and 7m people on waiting lists and have someone explain the efficiency savings open to the NHS in the light of that?

 

[threespires]

they are already using savings and efficiencies - my Mrs has just done a shift at a Sainsbury's that should have 4 staff but had just two of them - carnage was her description of proceedings not efficient. So extrapolate that to a health service with a 100k plus vacancies and 7m people on waiting lists and have someone explain the efficiency savings open to the NHS in the light of that?

Just have some patience...'opening up the healthcare market' will deliver the required efficiencies...by killing off all the poor and vulnerable people who can't afford private health care. We are currently governed by ghouls.

 

[lust overlord]

they are already using savings and efficiencies - my Mrs has just done a shift at a Sainsbury's that should have 4 staff but had just two of them - carnage was her description of proceedings not efficient. So extrapolate that to a health service with a 100k plus vacancies and 7m people on waiting lists and have someone explain the efficiency savings open to the NHS in the light of that?

My employer hasn't bothered replacing the three staff that have left in the last 14 months,this after they made 4 other job cuts post covid.

There is still the same amount of operational hours to cover though,so expect the remaining staff to do more.

The NHS has increased its workload with far less staff available.so they are way worse off than everyone else.

Fucking bean counters with absolutely no clue.