2bluejacko
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 1,088
unbelievable that they didn't show a disallowed goal in the highlights
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Dubai Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Jul 2007
- Messages
- 15,256
I'm no conspiracy theorist, and from what I've been told the goal was rightly chalked off because Sterling was interfering with play (I didn't notice him when watching it live), but that is pretty pathetic from the BBC not to show it at all. They surely have to class a disallowed goal as a key highlight of the game, even if it's just to show how momentum started to lean towards us.I have heard that MOTD never showed Silvas disallowed goal...is this true? If it is true then it's a disgrace. If it was a foul by Sterling, fair enough, great decision, but if it was for an offside, terrible decision... Either way, should be shown and discussed
Rammyblues
Well-Known Member
Thing that really gets on my wick is the fact we have no option but to pay the beeb a licence fee for fake and biased news. Wish we had the choice of paying.
inchy14
Well-Known Member
This is a very good point.
When will we ever score from a corner.
This has been mentioned for the last 5 years.
John Stones v Huddersfield (4th goal).
And 2 v Monaco.
We were fairly dominant at the back for the majority of the game yet they won at least 3 headers from corners yesterday, shows how dominant Otamendi actually is in the air.
johnmc
Well-Known Member
unbelievable that they didn't show a disallowed goal in the highlights
They didn't show Sunderlands disallowed goal pal.
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
That makes it doubly unbelievable.They didn't show Sunderlands disallowed goal pal.
portisheadblue
Well-Known Member
I have heard that MOTD never showed Silvas disallowed goal...is this true? If it is true then it's a disgrace. If it was a foul by Sterling, fair enough, great decision, but if it was for an offside, terrible decision... Either way, should be shown and discussed
It's not even in the highlights on City OS .... but Defoe's is .... WTFGO
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
Lovebitesandeveryfing
Well-Known Member
Raheem played himself into the game and had a good second half, but by god he was gash for the first fifteen or twenty minutes or so. By my count he either gave away every ball he received or was bundled over by the Sunderland defenders. Anyway, let's let that go, everyone else was good, including especially Clichy (!) and Kolarov in defence. Kev still looks slightly off his game to me, but maybe because he's playing deeper and taking on more duties in a defensive capacity. He didn't play for long enough to be judged, really.
That save from Pickford against Sergio towards the end was nothing short of brilliant. It was curving away from him right into the corner. That lad needs a close eye on him.
I had a good laugh at the end. Anybody notice that Pep went onto the pitch and started a rant with Merlin analysing every aspect of his performance for the previous ninety minutes, and Dave just decided he'd had enough, and made a gesture that said, "ok boss, tell me all about on on Monday morning at the training ground, I just want to get into that fucking bath right now!"
That save from Pickford against Sergio towards the end was nothing short of brilliant. It was curving away from him right into the corner. That lad needs a close eye on him.
I had a good laugh at the end. Anybody notice that Pep went onto the pitch and started a rant with Merlin analysing every aspect of his performance for the previous ninety minutes, and Dave just decided he'd had enough, and made a gesture that said, "ok boss, tell me all about on on Monday morning at the training ground, I just want to get into that fucking bath right now!"