es1
Well-Known Member
You mean the one that had zero comment on or replays shown?
Had that been against the rags they would have been calling for fucking airstrikes the twats!
they showed a replay during the game, looked level
You mean the one that had zero comment on or replays shown?
Had that been against the rags they would have been calling for fucking airstrikes the twats!
they showed a replay during the game, looked level
Did they?
I certainly didn't see it.
There goal wasn't offside, just on, but the chance they had at the start of the second half where the attacker ran on to a flicked header was about three yards offside.
There goal wasn't offside, just on, but the chance they had at the start of the second half where the attacker ran on to a flicked header was about three yards offside.
Something tells me you're not seeing many decisions from a neutral point of view eh.Fuck, this is blatant cheating.
- The penalty Hart saved was from a poor Thespian dive.
- The alleged Fernandinho penalty was another dive correctly spotted; though Turpin was gutted to show the yellow.
- The other alleged Fernandinho penalty was not, as the ball bounced to his elbow and his arm was folded over his chest.
- Their goal was built with an offside player to the right.
- City's first goal was Demichelis', cheated by the lino and the other **** next to the goal post.
- El Kun was kicked in the shin inside the box, stonewall penalty; then again the Platini minion was gutted to award it.
No swings and roundabouts there, just daylight robbery.