Talksport now

Status
Not open for further replies.
Noel Gallagher on again tonight 10pm, is he after a job there!!!
Should be interesting though, transfer window, rags farce and now Demachelis all up for debate
 
Oh my life, a Pellegrini outer has just been on saying Pellegrini will be gone by Christmas! It was a Blue from Salford who also mentioned letting Barry go was 'massive'......
 
malg said:
Oh my life, a Pellegrini outer has just been on saying Pellegrini will be gone by Christmas! It was a Blue from Salford who also mentioned letting Barry go was 'massive'......
Was that the blue who said i wouldnt let Garcia kick my garden gate never mind a football
 
What's wrong with some of these ex city players giving us no credit,marsh on talksport now plzen were like a semi pro side,unbelievable.
 
EL APACHE TEVEZ said:
What's wrong with some of these ex city players giving us no credit,marsh on talksport now plzen were like a semi pro side,unbelievable.

Because he knows they will lap it up! It's like sky saying how much our team costs compared to our opposition they never do it to other teams and it pisses me off but it seems to make them feel good about themselves
 
Cundy winding the rag up about Rooneys post match interview saying he still wants out, the rag presenter not having it , hilarious
 
Icckle Wayne doesn't want to talk about the transfer request he handed in last year when he'd fallen out with SBF.
He' much rather chat about how dedicated to U****Ds cause he's been since they wouldn't sell him to Chelsea and called the fat fucks bluff!
Apparently the MIB are not happy both he and Gollum Bollocks got a bit snappy with the reporters and wouldn't tow the pr line of peace and serenity.
I smell a tad of animosity - long may it grow and fester!
 
Kinkys Left Foot said:
Icckle Wayne doesn't want to talk about the transfer request he handed in last year when he'd fallen out with SBF.
He' much rather chat about how dedicated to U****Ds cause he's been since they wouldn't sell him to Chelsea and called the fat fucks bluff!
Apparently the MIB are not happy both he and Gollum Bollocks got a bit snappy with the reporters and wouldn't tow the pr line of peace and serenity.
I smell a tad of animosity - long may it grow and fester!

Opportunity on Sunday to pressure the fat unhappy one and he may just see red.
 
The propaganda machine was in overdrive this morning following wee Davey's win. Shit On Lou declaring there's only one way of playing for the rags which is attack, attack, attack. Vomit inducing. Incredulity followed that the press are giving shrek a hard time; they don't like it up them do they?!

To be fair, they damned us with faint praise, Ray Parlour declaring we did well, but if one or two City players hadn't been on it, then it could have been a different story. No shit Rocky?

Of the two results, I'd be more concerned that the rags defence looked a bit like ours did agains Stoke and Hull at times.
 
strongbowholic said:
The propaganda machine was in overdrive this morning following wee Davey's win. Shit On Lou declaring there's only one way of playing for the rags which is attack, attack, attack. Vomit inducing. Incredulity followed that the press are giving shrek a hard time; they don't like it up them do they?!

To be fair, they damned us with faint praise, Ray Parlour declaring we did well, but if one or two City players hadn't been on it, then it could have been a different story. No shit Rocky?

Of the two results, I'd be more concerned that the rags defence looked a bit like ours did agains Stoke and Hull at times.
Brazils in full rag twat mode this morning, Davy this Davy that
 
Despite all the evidence to the contrary Brazil announced that his 'source' in the 'Rooney camp' had confirmed that Ronney was completely happy to remain at OT and had no desire to move. Begs the question why Rooney wouldn't state that to be the case but what do I know anyway.
 
Como Cat said:
Despite all the evidence to the contrary Brazil announced that his 'source' in the 'Rooney camp' had confirmed that Ronney was completely happy to remain at OT and had no desire to move. Begs the question why Rooney wouldn't state that to be the case but what do I know anyway.
He could well be quite happy to stay but he's after a (presumably improved) new contract so the spin from the Rooney camp will be that he's not happy.

I'm firmly of the opinion that Ferguson & Gill connived with his agent 3 years ago when he put that first transfer request in. I'm pretty certain he asked for a significant wage increase and the Glazers initially said no. So between the four of them I suspect they came up with the idea of the transfer request and made sure there was an offer on the table from another club, in order to put pressure on the Glazers. It obviously worked then but it won't work again.

He's the highest paid player there by some distance (£40k a week more than RVP I understand) so they'll want to reduce his package not increase it.
 
Prestwich_Blue said:
Como Cat said:
Despite all the evidence to the contrary Brazil announced that his 'source' in the 'Rooney camp' had confirmed that Ronney was completely happy to remain at OT and had no desire to move. Begs the question why Rooney wouldn't state that to be the case but what do I know anyway.
He could well be quite happy to stay but he's after a (presumably improved) new contract so the spin from the Rooney camp will be that he's not happy.

I'm firmly of the opinion that Ferguson & Gill connived with his agent 3 years ago when he put that first transfer request in. I'm pretty certain he asked for a significant wage increase and the Glazers initially said no. So between the four of them I suspect they came up with the idea of the transfer request and made sure there was an offer on the table from another club, in order to put pressure on the Glazers. It obviously worked then but it won't work again.

He's the highest paid player there by some distance (£40k a week more than RVP I understand) so they'll want to reduce his package not increase it.
He's got a reasonably good negotiating position, though, in that without him the rags look a bit devoid of creativity and are really, really reliant on RVP.

Obviously that worked for them last season, but I think they realise that they can't just rely on RVP this year, with a retooled City, Mou back at Chelsea and Arsenal resurgent. So Rooney is still very important for them; he and his advisors know that and are ruthless enough to drive a hard bargain

Having said that, it's not obvious where he'd go if he left them so maybe both parties will be forced to compromise.
 
Was in the van this morning listening to Didi Hamann having a right go at City fans for loving Mancini. Slating us for still liking him when all he did was cause unrest within the club, upsetting players etc. and now Pellegrini has done more in three months turning it around than Mancini had done in all his time here with our players. Then he had a go at Mancini for writing an open letter in the Evening News to the fans when he should have just walked away and again causing unrest for the club. Slagged Mancini for only winning two trophies in three and a half years when he had been given every player he ever wanted to sign. He came across quite bitter so much so that Colin Murray was defending City fans for singing Mancini's name until the end of the season and even said he loved the 'We're not really here' chant and then he asked Hamann did he have a personal grudge against Mancini for something previous such was Hamann's vitriol towards Roberto. Couldn't listen to the rest of the show as I had to get out of the van and do some work so don't know if there was any reasoning behind his obvious dislike for Mancini but it was all to clear it was there.
 
Blue2112 said:
Was in the van this morning listening to Didi Hamann having a right go at City fans for loving Mancini. Slating us for still liking him when all he did was cause unrest within the club, upsetting players etc. and now Pellegrini has done more in three months turning it around than Mancini had done in all his time here with our players. Then he had a go at Mancini for writing an open letter in the Evening News to the fans when he should have just walked away and again causing unrest for the club. Slagged Mancini for only winning two trophies in three and a half years when he had been given every player he ever wanted to sign. He came across quite bitter so much so that Colin Murray was defending City fans for singing Mancini's name until the end of the season and even said he loved the 'We're not really here' chant and then he asked Hamann did he have a personal grudge against Mancini for something previous such was Hamann's vitriol towards Roberto. Couldn't listen to the rest of the show as I had to get out of the van and do some work so don't know if there was any reasoning behind his obvious dislike for Mancini but it was all to clear it was there.


I didnt hear today but he has said on there before he thinks mancini was a failure at city.The only reason i can guess is the ex-players are jealous because city didnt win things when they were there or they didn't get paid like todays players do.He clearly was not a failure so that arguement does not hold any water
 
karen7 said:
Blue2112 said:
Was in the van this morning listening to Didi Hamann having a right go at City fans for loving Mancini. Slating us for still liking him when all he did was cause unrest within the club, upsetting players etc. and now Pellegrini has done more in three months turning it around than Mancini had done in all his time here with our players. Then he had a go at Mancini for writing an open letter in the Evening News to the fans when he should have just walked away and again causing unrest for the club. Slagged Mancini for only winning two trophies in three and a half years when he had been given every player he ever wanted to sign. He came across quite bitter so much so that Colin Murray was defending City fans for singing Mancini's name until the end of the season and even said he loved the 'We're not really here' chant and then he asked Hamann did he have a personal grudge against Mancini for something previous such was Hamann's vitriol towards Roberto. Couldn't listen to the rest of the show as I had to get out of the van and do some work so don't know if there was any reasoning behind his obvious dislike for Mancini but it was all to clear it was there.


I didnt hear today but he has said on there before he thinks mancini was a failure at city.The only reason i can guess is the ex-players are jealous because city didnt win things when they were there or they didn't get paid like todays players do.He clearly was not a failure so that arguement does not hold any water
He lives quite near to Bobbys old house, a neighbourly dispute?
 
andyhinch said:
karen7 said:
Blue2112 said:
Was in the van this morning listening to Didi Hamann having a right go at City fans for loving Mancini. Slating us for still liking him when all he did was cause unrest within the club, upsetting players etc. and now Pellegrini has done more in three months turning it around than Mancini had done in all his time here with our players. Then he had a go at Mancini for writing an open letter in the Evening News to the fans when he should have just walked away and again causing unrest for the club. Slagged Mancini for only winning two trophies in three and a half years when he had been given every player he ever wanted to sign. He came across quite bitter so much so that Colin Murray was defending City fans for singing Mancini's name until the end of the season and even said he loved the 'We're not really here' chant and then he asked Hamann did he have a personal grudge against Mancini for something previous such was Hamann's vitriol towards Roberto. Couldn't listen to the rest of the show as I had to get out of the van and do some work so don't know if there was any reasoning behind his obvious dislike for Mancini but it was all to clear it was there.


I didnt hear today but he has said on there before he thinks mancini was a failure at city.The only reason i can guess is the ex-players are jealous because city didnt win things when they were there or they didn't get paid like todays players do.He clearly was not a failure so that arguement does not hold any water
He lives quite near to Bobbys old house, a neighbourly dispute?

A bit like Mark Hughes and Carrick whatever happened to that one, wasn't it over a high fence/wall or a hedge?

I found it strange that he had a go at him and in particular the City fans for supporing him especially as we are now mid-September. Fair enough we won away in Europe something he kept repeating Mancini didn't manage last season but to be fair we didn't have a Plezn in the group last season.
 
andyhinch said:
karen7 said:
Blue2112 said:
Was in the van this morning listening to Didi Hamann having a right go at City fans for loving Mancini. Slating us for still liking him when all he did was cause unrest within the club, upsetting players etc. and now Pellegrini has done more in three months turning it around than Mancini had done in all his time here with our players. Then he had a go at Mancini for writing an open letter in the Evening News to the fans when he should have just walked away and again causing unrest for the club. Slagged Mancini for only winning two trophies in three and a half years when he had been given every player he ever wanted to sign. He came across quite bitter so much so that Colin Murray was defending City fans for singing Mancini's name until the end of the season and even said he loved the 'We're not really here' chant and then he asked Hamann did he have a personal grudge against Mancini for something previous such was Hamann's vitriol towards Roberto. Couldn't listen to the rest of the show as I had to get out of the van and do some work so don't know if there was any reasoning behind his obvious dislike for Mancini but it was all to clear it was there.


I didnt hear today but he has said on there before he thinks mancini was a failure at city.The only reason i can guess is the ex-players are jealous because city didnt win things when they were there or they didn't get paid like todays players do.He clearly was not a failure so that arguement does not hold any water
He lives quite near to Bobbys old house, a neighbourly dispute?


The plot thickens..got to be something personal me thinks
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top