Talksport

I listened to talksport on the way into work this morning (around 5am) and they were discussing the cup final, slagging off kepa etc. (quite rightly)

Ben Thatcher, one of their sports 'experts' said twice that Hazard had a perfectly good goal disallowed to deny Chelsea the win.

Now, I know I'm getting old and I may have missed it on one of my many pee breaks, but the only time the net was found during the game (outside of penalties!) was when Aguero scored and VAR deemed it to be offside.

Did I miss something? I've googled it and can see no reference to it I'm perplexed...


Me too, I got in my car at 5am, heard this clown but thought " I must have missed that".
Amazing radio!
 
Heard a Chelsea fan about 20 mins ago , "City they for the taking" , Chelsea better team" , "Why did the lineman flag Hazard offside" (and no Hazard didn't have any goal ruled out for offside, he was just offside) ! Jimmy White agreeing with "yes ,yes, yes"
Well if you look at the stats, I would say it's hard to win games when you don't have at least 1 shot on target !
Chelsea 7 shots 0 on target .
City 13 with only 3 on target .
 
I listened to talksport on the way into work this morning (around 5am) and they were discussing the cup final, slagging off kepa etc. (quite rightly)

Ben Thatcher, one of their sports 'experts' said twice that Hazard had a perfectly good goal disallowed to deny Chelsea the win.

Now, I know I'm getting old and I may have missed it on one of my many pee breaks, but the only time the net was found during the game (outside of penalties!) was when Aguero scored and VAR deemed it to be offside.

Did I miss something? I've googled it and can see no reference to it I'm perplexed...

Maybe he was out with Brazil last night.
 
Heard a Chelsea fan about 20 mins ago , "City they for the taking" , Chelsea better team" , "Why did the lineman flag Hazard offside" (and no Hazard didn't have any goal ruled out for offside, he was just offside) ! Jimmy White agreeing with "yes ,yes, yes"
Well if you look at the stats, I would say it's hard to win games when you don't have at least 1 shot on target !
Chelsea 7 shots 0 on target .
City 13 with only 3 on target .

Wasn’t the one Ed tipped over on target?

Or did I just imagine that?
 
Heard a Chelsea fan about 20 mins ago , "City they for the taking" , Chelsea better team" , "Why did the lineman flag Hazard offside" (and no Hazard didn't have any goal ruled out for offside, he was just offside) ! Jimmy White agreeing with "yes ,yes, yes"
Well if you look at the stats, I would say it's hard to win games when you don't have at least 1 shot on target !
Chelsea 7 shots 0 on target .
City 13 with only 3 on target .
Amazing to think how many Chelsea fans thought they played well.
City were there for the taking but not by a team with 39% of possession,7 attempts and none on target and 4 corners.
Every caller making them to be unlucky.
Far from it.Okay an improvement from recent weeks but that's all.
 
Wasn’t the one Ed tipped over on target?

Or did I just imagine that?
Sorry mate can't remember it , but stats show Chelsea = shots on target 0 . So it may of been going over anyway . It wasn't the best of games with Chelsea seeming too park the bus and hit us on the break, but on chances and presession we still deserved the win
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.