Talksport

eyalluvitt said:
Done Joinery work for several rag players over the years in the Cheshire golden triangle and Cole was by far the most anti City and just generally unpleasant character of the lot. The alleged fossilized turd in the underfloor void halfway up his stairs was definitely not mine.
Click to expand...
If not, why not?

YOU HAD ONE JOB (or not, as the case may be) ;-)
 
Cockney Rag taking the piss out of Carlton Cole who really is thick as mince.
 
ancoats said:
some good points this morning that should be answered

what is happening with the punishment for united not playing the liverpool game
the club have been found guilty to letting the fans in that gate (video showing clearly)

the riots was a setup to stop the game from being played united did not want to play the game with liverpool because of the chance of losing the game and the title race to a rival ? the premier league would have come down hard on city or anybody else doing what them scum fans did
Click to expand...
I'm assuming their punishment was not getting a second half penalty and one of leicesters goals disallow Var?
 
mat said:
Cockney Rag taking the piss out of Carlton Cole who really is thick as mince.
Click to expand...
Andy Cole and Carlton Cole are two of the thickest people wandering the streets of this country, never mind being asked to articulate their opinions on television. Numb as piss stones the pair of them. Barely literate
 
Harlaching Sky Blue said:
Was it just me or did anyone else have a tough time listening to Trevor Sinclairs reasoning about wanting United to get a three point reduction for playing a weakened team.
When asked - correctly I felt in the context - about why City shouldnt also get a points reduction for the weakened team they put out v Chelsea (that also could have effected the others in the CL race) , he was adamant that we shouldnt as our weakened team was better than Uniteds.
Thought Trevs argument was flawed to be fair and didnt do himself any favours I felt uncomfortable with the blue blinkered view and arrogance behind that view. I love the way he stands up for us normally but thought he was off the mark here. To be fair he probably sees it as effecting West Ham but I didnt like the "our weakened team is better than yours and weve earned the right to field a weakened team" rationale (sorry wationale, I sound like Simon Jordan there)

That said its bloody funny that the media going nuts the whole scenario is hilarious
1) United throw in the title towel to their city rivals be playing a rubbish team, when actually they still had a albeit small glimmer of hope
2) The shitstorm that United cost Liverpool a place in the Champs League - that three weeks ago neither wanted to be part of - by playing a rubbish team
3) The fixture congestion leading to the rubbish team was all Uniteds doing by their fans "peaceful protesting" breaking and entering in the first place!
4) The rubbish team effects directly Liverpool who constantly devalue cups and screw small teams over by playing rubbish teams. The sympathy to Liverpool is brilliant, lead by that great journalist Vik Tim.
5) No mention anywhere of Candlepools reason for not qualifying for the CL was more down to them losing to Fulham at home than Leicester grabbing points at OT.

The hypocrisy is so funny, I enjoyed that nearly as much as Jackies phone in!
Click to expand...

It was obviously a wind up but he did mention it was for failing to ensure the game went ahead which was then compounded by the weakened side.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.