Talksport

west didsblue

Well-Known Member
Joined
2 Oct 2011
Messages
25,669
One takeaway from reading through the Swiss ramble thread is that in the years since the Coutinho transfer, Liverpool's net spend has actually been higher than ours at £77m per year compared to £73m. Looking at the overall picture our spending has been 19% higher than Liverpool's but only 1% higher than Chelsea's. When you look at value for money there's really no comparison.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bez

Milesvk

Member
Joined
18 Mar 2014
Messages
14
One takeaway from reading through the Swiss ramble thread is that in the years since the Coutinho transfer, Liverpool's net spend has actually been higher than ours at £77m per year compared to £73m. Looking at the overall picture our spending has been 19% higher than Liverpool's but only 1% higher than Chelsea's. When you look at value for money there's really no comparison.
So basically, if pep sells foden for 200m and palmer and mcatee for 20m each, he will finally get the recognition he deserves because our net spend will look great!
Fucking idiots.
 

feedmpenzaandhewillscore

Well-Known Member
Joined
2 Apr 2012
Messages
7,612
Location
Front of the kippax chomping on a wagon wheel
My usual response to the net spend argument is to ask them if that means they're really a selling club. That usually confuses them.

Thats what they are for all this net spend shite they come out with, their best players don’t stay and use them as a stepping stone for bigger contracts. Mane gone and Salah probably fucking off for nowt next summer 2014 is repeating again, Ricky Lambert will be dusting his shin pads and boots off.
 

Don't have an account?

Register now!
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.