Talksport

It becomes difficult to spot the difference between hypocrisy and following the station/channel/papers orders for the day.

I personally would have great problems being told 'Yes I know what you said yesterday but today I want you to say the complete opposite' - (and by so doing come across as as a hypocritical dickhead with few principles or morals.)

But that is the way the modern media operate since Murdoch and the Sun came to power.

Agree with that. The murdoch press will always find an agenda or someting to be outraged about even if it involves complete hypocrisy!
 
Agree with that. The murdoch press will always find an agenda or something to be outraged about even if it involves complete hypocrisy!


Unfortunately millions of US Brits pay good money for it plus those who read the online version.

Even worse to contemplate is the influence the paper seems to have on these readers and the knock on way that can affect politics etc.
 
John Cross reckons the rags smashing the £100 million pound transfer barrier would be a "Good thing". He'd have gone apeshit if it was us.

I've started listening to Talkshite 2 which seems more intelligent. Maybe Rupert is turning Talkshite into The Sun and its Sister station The Times.
 
I don't listen to it myself, but judging from what the majority of people on here say about maybe that's a good thing. I'd end up foaming at the mouth and wanting to physically attack these so-called 'presenters'.
I don't understand why Blues would put themselves through this sort of immoral, biased garbage - I know I certainly couldn't.
 
I don't listen to it myself, but judging from what the majority of people on here say about maybe that's a good thing. I'd end up foaming at the mouth and wanting to physically attack these so-called 'presenters'.
I don't understand why Blues would put themselves through this sort of immoral, biased garbage - I know I certainly couldn't.

For me listening to Talkshite was like following England, both pointless and causing unwelcome aggravation. I gave up listening to this shite months ago and the England team following the last World Cup and feel much the better in both cases.
 
I don't listen to it myself, but judging from what the majority of people on here say about maybe that's a good thing. I'd end up foaming at the mouth and wanting to physically attack these so-called 'presenters'.
I don't understand why Blues would put themselves through this sort of immoral, biased garbage - I know I certainly couldn't.

Just listen to it and laugh at the people, generally neanderthal sheep, that take it seriously
The only time I listen is when I'm on a long drive down South and it really is comedy gold

If anyone ever challenges me over something that's spouted on Talkshite, I say "Please tell me that you don't take that anything on there seriously!" and leave it at that
 
It becomes difficult to spot the difference between hypocrisy and following the station/channel/papers orders for the day.

I personally would have great problems being told 'Yes I know what you said yesterday but today I want you to say the complete opposite' - (and by so doing come across as as a hypocritical dickhead with few principles or morals.)

But that is the way the modern media operate since Murdoch and the Sun came to power.

I've heard Gough do it.

I can't remember which order it was in, but one day, he was saying what a good thing the loan system was, and either the previous day or the day after, he was saying it was a disgrace that clubs like Chelsea and City could loan out so many players at once.
 
I've heard Gough do it.

I can't remember which order it was in, but one day, he was saying what a good thing the loan system was, and either the previous day or the day after, he was saying it was a disgrace that clubs like Chelsea and City could loan out so many players at once.

I've heard them do it in the space of ten minutes, they propose something ludicrous and in the course of babbling on it dawns on them how ludicrous it is, they then end with something like..."it's interesting" meaning the opposite is true, or "I can see both points of view" which means we're gobsmackingly wrong, or it's "certainly a talking point" which means it isn't, as it's as plain as the nose on your face we're wrong.
 
I've heard them do it in the space of ten minutes, they propose something ludicrous and in the course of babbling on it dawns on them how ludicrous it is, they then end with something like..."it's interesting" meaning the opposite is true, or "I can see both points of view" which means we're gobsmackingly wrong, or it's "certainly a talking point" which means it isn't, as it's as plain as the nose on your face we're wrong.


Most of their listeners don't have a great attention span so probably don't notice.
 
Don't forget people, this is the station that once employed a certain Mr Irani...'nuff said!
For all the shite it still brings us comedy gold when that cockney rag starts blubbing every time the rags lose.
 
Do Liverpool keep the money from Sky or return it as its owned by Murdoch?
I get your point, but only 39% of British Sky Broadcasting is owned by News Corp.

Amazed by Colin Murray's decision to quite Talk Sport. He clearly puts his beliefs first.
After being axed by the beeb, though, where on earth can he get a media job?
Then again he'd be a mega star on BT Sport as he is reasonable - 300% better than most of the oiks that hang out their.
 
Last edited:
I get your point, but only 39% of British Sky Broadcasting is owned by News Corp.

Amazed by Colin Murray's decision to quite Talk Sport. He clearly puts his believes first.
After being axed by the beeb, though, where on earth can he get a media job?
Then again he'd be a mega star on BT Sport as he is reasonable - 300% better than most of the oiks that hang out their.


He still does their TV darts coverage and they miss a trick if they don't get him back on 5Live or MOTD2. If BT sport gave him his own Saturday morning pre match show it would piss all over fletch and sav in their ratings.
 
I dont' take it too serious. But obviously pick up on the anti City bias.
This mornings gem was John Cross going through the teams for this seasons facied
winners. Rags, Chelsea all mentioned and talk about the spending and
he says well obviously City will force the prices up.
 
I dont' take it too serious. But obviously pick up on the anti City bias.
This mornings gem was John Cross going through the teams for this seasons facied
winners. Rags, Chelsea all mentioned and talk about the spending and
he says well obviously City will force the prices up.

Don't expect any less from Cross. He's a bitter Arsenal c@nt!
 
I dont' take it too serious. But obviously pick up on the anti City bias.
This mornings gem was John Cross going through the teams for this seasons facied
winners. Rags, Chelsea all mentioned and talk about the spending and
he says well obviously City will force the prices up.
Force the fucking prices up,what have the rag cnuts being doing all these years getting the players on free transfers,what a shit he is for coming off with that,then again it's all about painting us in a bad light..
 
Force the fucking prices up,what have the rag cnuts being doing all these years getting the players on free transfers,what a shit he is for coming off with that,then again it's all about painting us in a bad light..

That's why i posted. My flabber was truly ghasted. Cheek ****.
John Cross not you.
 
I dont' take it too serious. But obviously pick up on the anti City bias.
This mornings gem was John Cross going through the teams for this seasons facied
winners. Rags, Chelsea all mentioned and talk about the spending and
he says well obviously City will force the prices up.

Jamie Jackson (guardian) just said city have money although they are not in the same league as united. Think he must off meant the Europa league.
 
Jamie Jackson (guardian) just said city have money although they are not in the same league as united. Think he must off meant the Europa league.
Exactly right. Our owner only takes money out of the club in management fees and dividends, whereas the saintly owners of the rags pump money in.

Err, hang on, have I got that the right way round??
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top