Teacher Training

Teachers' work contracts are based around the needs of the kids, not the need to please ill-informed whingers who will moan about anyone who they perceive to be in a better situation than themselves. Schools are only teaching for 39 weeks because kids can only learn for 39 weeks. Now you could make them formally come in during holiday to prep the next term, but that would very much be the same as what happens unofficially now, with a 35% pay rise for all teachers. I imagine a lot would go for that. But it still wouldn't solve the problems of parents who just want schools to be open to look after their kids for free.
I wasnt aware kids could only learn for 39 weeks, is that a legal thing or based upon educational psychology ?

I know in France and Japan they only have 10 weeks holiday and South Korea a rather ludicrous 4 weeks, which academically seems to produce very high achievers, but it does damage their mental health with them sadly having a very high suicide rate in school age children.
 
I wasnt aware kids could only learn for 39 weeks, is that a legal thing or based upon educational psychology ?
I'm not aware of any specific research about it and the 39 weeks is actually a legal minimum. But the current schedules are based around what's considered best for students rather than anything else. Whether that's based in research or just assumptions is another question, but the general perception seems to be that learners need time to unwind, and it can't be a coincidence that almost every country on the planet operates a similar system.

I know in France and Japan they only have 10 weeks holiday and South Korea a rather ludicrous 4 weeks, which academically seems to produce very high achievers, but it does damage their mental health with them sadly having a very high suicide rate in school age children.
Korea is fucking awful, by all accounts. There was a story on the BBC just the other day of a teacher committing suicide because of bullying from parents. I have a few friends who taught there and they all said it's horrendous. I was offered a job there and someone who worked at the school actually personally emailed me to warn me off it. Korea isn't a particularly good test case, because they also all do insane levels of private tuition in addition to their school work. You could argue that the ridiculous hours work, but it's worth mentioning that when Korea were topping the chart, Finland were coming second with the lowest contact hours in the world, so who really had the best education system?

They definitely have long summer holidays though, because I had friends who used to work there in the public schools and they all used to talk about this practice called deskwarming. Basically the overseas teachers were all hired on contracts that had a standard 4 weeks of holiday, and because they were being paid, there were expected to come in during summer and just sit at their desks even though there was nothing to do.

The other issue you get with longer terms is that teachers will inevitably have less prep time in relation to teaching time. So what will happen is that yes they'll get more teaching time, but less time to plan it, so it will be of a lower quality because it takes time to make engaging lessons. Personally, I would suggest that if you want really good lessons, the planning to teaching time should be 1:1. Obviously the more experienced you get, the more you can reuse materials from previous years (until someone decides to change the syllabus just as you've got it perfect) and just tweak them. But I still think 1:1 is the gold standard.
 
Not many professional jobs pay overtime these days. Part of being a professional and earning a "good" salary along with maintaining your professional competencies for Chartership to relevant institutions
I remember as a teacher giving up a week holiday to take kids to an educational camp.
No extra pay, just expected.
The school liaison police inspector regularly came to see us whilst there.
As he admitted, on time and a half.
 
I was a teacher. I am no longer a teacher though I still work in the education sector.

The job can be incredibly rewarding, yet despite that, one in 10 of all qualified teachers left the state-funded sector in the academic year 2021-22. There is also an increase in the number of new teachers leaving the sector after one year - from 12.4 per cent in 2020 to 12.8 per cent in 2021. Given the investment that applicants to teaching make to qualify, these retention figures are deeply concerning.

I really enjoy teaching children, but the demands of teaching can be alarmingly heavy. At the time of leaving teaching in the UK, I was head of PE, and Pupil Premium lead across two schools in a federation. I also led Y3 and Y4 in those two schools. I was paid 27k a year. This was a rural school with a small number of teachers, and under constant budget pressure. The final straw was the inability to provide additional support to two children in my class. One was in the first percentile of all readers, and had an IQ of 70, while the other was a danger to other children and could not go to the toilet alone. With no additional support, nor classroom TA, the situation was unmanageable. The LA would not provide additional funding because I could not evidence the delivery of sufficient additional support and results - a requirement to justify additional funding. I could not provide that because of the lack of additional classroom support!

I generally worked a 60 hour week. I planned lessons at weekends and marked approximately 60 books every evening. I ran after-school clubs and regularly took children to sports events. In addition, the increasing demands to 'sell schools' resulted in regular social media activity and school website updates. This, in turn, meant more demanding parents who felt more 'involved' in school life. The 2 hours of planning time received per week were generally eaten into by pressured colleagues filling their own objectives. WhatsApp messages about planning and admin were regularly sent up to 9pm.

I left the UK to teach internationally. I received a similar salary in a country with a cost of living approximately half that of the UK. I received 7 hours per week of uninterrupted planning time and there was zero contact at weekends. Within the seven hours, I was able to plan all lessons thoroughly and complete any outstanding admin task. I was head of English, and the coordinator of the lower primary school - I had a similar seniority to the UK. Subject specialists taught languages, PE and music. It was a radically different experience with levels of support light-years away from my UK experience.

Teachers in the UK will have many experiences to tell, both positive and negative, but the fact is that we are not recruiting enough teachers to fill roles, and we are losing too many teachers. Together, that is a terrible recipe. Things have to change.
 
Last edited:
It should also be noted in Finland schooling does not start until the age of 7.
And all the UK headteachers and education tsars go over there on jollies, visit Lapland, knock back vodka, see the Northern Lights, say how marvellous it is... and then return to the UK and continue with their previous policies.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.