Tommy Nookah
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 May 2009
- Messages
- 282
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.dontstayin.com/chat/k-3157603" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.dontstayin.com/chat/k-3157603</a>Bilboblue said:
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Terry further problems ahead ?
- Thread starter cleavers
- Start date
M
M
mat
Guest
Bojinov The Bull said:If it was only 1% truthful then the sun or someone would be on it already, the rumours a load of rubbish, it's just a case of chinese whispers on various forums!
Two Words.
Super Injunction.
Tommy Nookah
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 May 2009
- Messages
- 282
thats quite an old post,read the comments after it,was put on when spurs beat bolton,so if true would have been in the papers surely
Dr.Faustus said:Superbia said:Hardly a new rumour that
Seems as though it is a few weeks old, though this may not be what the op was on about; I just found it and guessed. No one has passed on any PM's yet!
Lot older than weeks!
Gaz in Zurich
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 22 Feb 2009
- Messages
- 1,259
Superbia said:Dr.Faustus said:Seems as though it is a few weeks old, though this may not be what the op was on about; I just found it and guessed. No one has passed on any PM's yet!
Lot older than weeks!
Doesn't the fact it's old, and quite a bit has been true, give it more credibility?
Gaz in Belgium said:Superbia said:Lot older than weeks!
Doesn't the fact it's old, and quite a bit has been true, give it more credibility?
Not disputing the truth or otherwise of it, just that this particular rumour goes back a long while, way before the Bridge saga etc.
Dr.Faustus
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 22 Oct 2008
- Messages
- 782
Superbia said:Gaz in Belgium said:Doesn't the fact it's old, and quite a bit has been true, give it more credibility?
Not disputing the truth or otherwise of it, just that this particular rumour goes back a long while, way before the Bridge saga etc.
Which part? That particular construction of the rumours cannot have as it references the proven scandal (with VP) in it and was first posted in late February.
Ricster
Well-Known Member
Gaz in Belgium said:Superbia said:Lot older than weeks!
Doesn't the fact it's old, and quite a bit has been true, give it more credibility?
I thought that, especially about the Cheryl Cole bit.
Dr.Faustus said:Superbia said:Not disputing the truth or otherwise of it, just that this particular rumour goes back a long while, way before the Bridge saga etc.
Which part? That particular construction of the rumours cannot have as it references the proven scandal (with VP) in it and was first posted in late February.
The part that was commented on and I responsded to