Superbia said:Dr.Faustus said:Which part? That particular construction of the rumours cannot have as it references the proven scandal (with VP) in it and was first posted in late February.
The part that was commented on and I responsded to
Dr.Faustus said:Superbia said:The part that was commented on and I responsded to
Ah I see, I don't think that is linked to the 17yo incident published in the Sun a few years ago though; seems to imply a new (<16) I can't see any truth in it; I think someone posted nonsense on a whim.
Superbia said:Dr.Faustus said:Ah I see, I don't think that is linked to the 17yo incident published in the Sun a few years ago though; seems to imply a new (<16) I can't see any truth in it; I think someone posted nonsense on a whim.
Let's just say that in certain areas down south, Terry's "tastes" have seemed to be common knowledge
Dr.Faustus said:Superbia said:Let's just say that in certain areas down south, Terry's "tastes" have seemed to be common knowledge
Curious rumour, but I don't think it's that fair to speculate upon it until and if it becomes widespread enough to be household gossip; just in case the forum gets into trouble. Its not so much that anyone threatening action would have a leg to stand on, merely the hassle of a case would be time consuming.
;)Dr.Faustus said:John Terry Underage, first link..
Dr.Faustus said:Haha, veeery funny!
Anyway, I know how unlikely it is that a forum would get sued, however they have a positive duty to be vigilant as the host of information.