remoh said:
Oooooh, you silly sod!
I'll repeat it one last time. Try to concentrate, please!!!
He refused to warm up. Instead of sending him on anyway, Roberto took the hump. THAT IS WHY HE HAS NOT BEEN CHARGED WITH REFUSING TO PLAY!!!
This is definitely the last time that I'll explain this to you.
He has been found guilty of refusing to participate, not just charged: FOUND GUILTY you pompous git. I've spelt this out for you on the other thread.
The five contractual obligations
found by the disciplinary panel to have been breached are:
1.
An obligation to participate in any matches in which the player is selected to play for the club when directed by a Club official.
2. An obligation to undertake such other duties and to participate in such other activities as are consistent with the performance of the player’s duties and as are reasonably required of him.
3. An obligation to comply with and act in accordance with all lawful instructions of any authorised official of the Club.
4. An obligation to observe the statutes and regulations of FIFA and UEFA, the FA Rules, the League Rules, the Code of Practice and the Club rules, including but not limited to breach of Rule E3(1) of the FA Rules (obligation on the player all times to act in the best interests of the game and not act in any manner which is improper or which brings the game into disrepute).
5. An obligation not to knowingly or recklessly do anything or omit to do anything which is likely to bring the Club or the game of football into disrepute or cause the player or the Club to be in breach of the Rules (as defined in the contract) or cause damage to the Club.
It doesn't say charged with refusing to warm up it says FOUND TO BE IN BREACH OF AN OBLIGATION TO PARTICIPATE IN ANY MATCHES IE: GUILTY NOT 'CHARGED WITH' FOUND FUCKING GUILTY OF.
He has failed to contest this guilty finding & now fucked poff to Argentina without permission. Perhaps he's using you as his advisor ?