Tevez finally apologises

I can see Tevez dressed up as Father Teds Mrs Doyle saying he is 'So Sorry'

Can't find the bloody you tube clip, but for those that have seen it will know what I mean
 
rickmcfc said:
Have you just seen craig Burley on ESPN after the game? What a complete and utter twat.

Burley always is, Dickov talking sense though.

On the 9th January 2012, the BBC began an investigation into complaints received about Burley's appearance on BBC Radio 5 Live during the Chelsea vs Portsmouth FA 3rd round tie the previous weekend. Listeners complained that Burley was "noticeably drunk" whilst on air, though the BBC declined to comment until its investigation has been completed
 
Someone has just texted me to say Bobby and the troll have a meeting scheduled for tomoz. Don't know the source.
 
rickmcfc said:
Hamann Pineapple said:
rickmcfc said:
Have you just seen craig Burley on ESPN after the game? What a complete and utter twat.
.

I thought Dickov was going to stab him with his pen at one point!

Why the fuck didn't he stab him with his pen?! Or something sharper.
 
Manchester City boss Roberto Mancini on whether Carlos Tevez will return to first-team action this season after the Argentine striker apologised for his recent conduct: "I'm happy with what Carlos said. Tomorrow [Thursday] I will talk to him. I've accepted his apology. There's a chance he can play for Manchester City again. I think he needs two or three weeks to train, and some games, but if he's ready in two or three weeks that's normal."
 
SWP's back said:
PistonBlue said:
Dubai Blue said:
I disagree. This will be Mancini's call, and his alone. Mancini's not stupid; he knows that Tevez could possibly do a job if disaster strikes and all three strikers suffer injury/suspension/loss of form at the same time. He's purely there as insurance.

Mancini also knows Tevez cannot be trusted.
What is the more likely scenario, Tevez doing the business or Tevez spoiling to get at Mancini? At best 50/50 because who can really read Tevez' true intentions here? For me, that's not even a gamble we should consider at this stage of the season. Look at the way other bad influences have been dealt with by the manager, Adebayor and Bellamy are saints in comparison but were shipped out without delay.
So I'm struggling with the notion that Mancini will accept the player back after everything that has happened. That's my worry because if the manager is told to include Tevez in the squad for political reasons, he could walk. If I'm wrong and Mancini is happy for Tevez to play for him again then so be it, I won't like it but I'll have to accept it.
Never gonna happen and you are wrong. Those journalists briefed by City have all said Mancini is at ease with it.

The other day, one of the papers was talking about how Bobby Manc blows up at situation and has been known to beserk (a good thing, BTW) but then calms down where the occasion demands it and is the ultimate pragmatist. Whereas Tevez is prone to marathon sulks and feuds. All of which suggests to me that Bobby will play Tevez but only if he believes he needs to and the air has been temporarily been cleared. And that remains to be seen. We're scoring freely again now so hopefully we won't need the pathetic little fornicator. As for Tevez, he'll keep on sulking and hating but he'll do what he's told until May.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.