Tevez finally apologises

So Tevez-Balotelli? Tevez-Dzeko? Tevez-Aguero?

At one point the plan was to have these 4 interchange. Tevez will score for us if he plays. We know this. Well need him to score to sell him as you can't charge £30m for a player whose last goal was scored a year ago.
 
Hart
Richards---Kompany---Lescott---Clichy
YaYa--Nasri
Silva---Aguero---Balo
Tevez
 
Has this been posted. Highlights the position of City towards Tevez, and the inner workings that culminated in the apology..

http://www.thenational.ae/thenation...eeking-to-make-the-best-of-his-remaining-time

Carlos Tevez is just seeking to make the best of his remaining time

With his tail clamped firmly between his legs, the multimillionaire footballer who was treated "like a dog" is attempting to make the best of his remaining time at Manchester City.

Late on Tuesday evening, after several hours' discussion with the club's hierarchy, Carlos Tevez conceded to the unreserved apology demanded of him to reinstate pay cheques and offer a route back to competitive football.

This time no equivocation was permitted. Roberto Mancini, the manager accused of handling the striker like a canine when he refused to follow instructions to warm up in Munich some five months previously, left the meeting for others to handle. The outcome was a club-issued statement that placed all the blame on Tevez's head.

"I wish to apologise sincerely and unreservedly to everybody I have let down and to whom my actions over the last few months have caused offence," read Tevez's mea culpa. "My wish is to concentrate on playing football for Manchester City Football Club."

Alongside those words came confirmation that the Argentine had withdrawn his appeal to the Premier League against a gross misconduct fine that helped take the financial penalty for a list of misdemeanours to over £9 million (Dh51.8m). Having failed to force a January exit from the club, Tevez had accepted that City were not prepared to back down to someone they feel has wantonly damaged the club's reputation.

Both parties still intend to part ways when the opportunity next arrives. Kia Joorabchian, the adviser City hold jointly responsible for their troubles with Tevez, explored the possibility of moves to South America or Russia without finding a club willing to meet the asking price. Returning himself to fitness and playing competitive football should help deliver a summer buyer in Europe.

That will be no straightforward process. Tevez, who often has issues controlling his weight when off-duty, spent much of his unapproved holiday indulging himself. The 28 year old did little to keep himself fit.

City have placed him on an intensive "training programme designed to return him to optimum fitness", yet there is no guarantee of playing time. Instead, it will be left entirely to Mancini to choose if and when to restore Tevez to a senior squad that has started to struggle in recent months with just 11 goals scored in the last eight Premier League games.

If that lull continues and Mancini calculates his chances of taking the domestic title from Manchester United will be improved by utilising Tevez, the ultra-pragmatic aspect of his nature will make it happen. When the Italian needed the already unruly forward to push City to Champions League qualification and FA Cup victory last season, Tevez was kept onside with the captaincy in a move that City's hierarchy predicted would brook future problems.

If those remain unresolved, their costs severe for both player and club, City have at least forced Tevez to recognise authority. Now, they may even receive a few more goals from a man they rewarded so richly to hurt other football clubs, not their own.
 
Personally I don't believe Tevez will actually appear on the pitch for City this year unless, either injuries/suspensions are so great that we need him or he truly does show real commitment and we can trust him.

Whatever happens, it is worth remembering that Tevez is definitely not the first footballer connected with the Manchester sides to have stormed off mid season; or refused to play.

Back in the early 1970s George Best (still idolised today) failed to turn up for training at Utd. He then didn't turn up for an important Div One Utd game.

In 72 he walked out on United and refused to do anything for them.

Fans, media, management said he'd never play for Utd again... but he did in 73. He didn't stay for long however but he did return and he did play.
 
Gary James said:
Personally I don't believe Tevez will actually appear on the pitch for City this year unless, either injuries/suspensions are so great that we need him or he truly does show real commitment and we can trust him.

Whatever happens, it is worth remembering that Tevez is definitely not the first footballer connected with the Manchester sides to have stormed off mid season; or refused to play.

Back in the early 1970s George Best (still idolised today) failed to turn up for training at Utd. He then didn't turn up for an important Div One Utd game.

In 72 he walked out on United and refused to do anything for them.

Fans, media, management said he'd never play for Utd again... but he did in 73. He didn't stay for long however but he did return and he did play.

Utd were relatively 'desperate' at that time though. I don't see a true parallel with Tevez in as much as Best was in control of that situation, and Utd probably did need him, Tevez probably thought he was in control, but clearly isn't and we don't need him.

I agree though, I can't see him getting back on the pitch unless we are truly desperate or he has clearly demonstrated his commitment.
 
nijinskybell said:
Utd were relatively 'desperate' at that time though. I don't see a true parallel with Tevez in as much as Best was in control of that situation, and Utd probably did need him, Tevez probably thought he was in control, but clearly isn't and we don't need him.

I agree though, I can't see him getting back on the pitch unless we are truly desperate or he has clearly demonstrated his commitment.

Exactly. Morals, attitudes etc. all depend on a team's need. I heard on my way home last night someone complaining to BBC Radio Manchester that City fans have backtracked etc., but my point is that Best is an example of what happens when a team truly does need a player.
 
alky313 said:
So Tevez-Balotelli? Tevez-Dzeko? Tevez-Aguero?

At one point the plan was to have these 4 interchange. Tevez will score for us if he plays. We know this. Well need him to score to sell him as you can't charge £30m for a player whose last goal was scored a year ago.

I'm not so confident that he will bag important goals after what we saw from him at the end of last season and the beginning of this when he was more often than not a disinterested passenger.

Now he will be less fit and will still have no desire or hunger for wearing the shirt. Only here cos he has to be and will doubtless go through the motions in the meantime.

4th choice striker for me and will hopefully be used as such coming off the bench when we don't need to rely on him too much, as one thing is 100% certain and that is that we cannot in any way rely on the toxic twat.
 
article-2105374-11E048BA000005DC-983_468x583.jpg


article-2105374-11E048A6000005DC-818_468x321.jpg
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.