JoeMercer'sWay said:hgblue said:TCIB said:How is a person being interviewed outside a "real fan" as opposed to a fan who posts an opposing view here ?
Most "real" city fans still hate him, unless we are to assume 3 people interviewed now counts as some sort of majority view ?
Most lads here go when they can if not most matches, those that can't probably have wives and kids to provide for and can't justify all the costs incurred.
Since we are all bitters why don't you bugger of to another forum then smart arse ?
It's definitely noticeable that Bluemoon is a lot more anti-Tevez than match going City fans that I know. Talk of Tevez being booed, people not cheering when he scores, leaving the Stadium when he comes on, etc, etc, just will not happen apart from a tiny minority. Yet, they seem to be the majority on here. I've not figured out why that is, but there's definitely a marked difference.
People, for the good of the team and to avoid confrontation(seeing the fisticuffs a squabble about Gelson Fernandes caused once leads me to believe most will just put up and shut up) will just shut up and put their personal opinions to one side during the game.
With a media camera in front of them, only an attention seeking idiot would give the press the destabilisation ammo by saying we're not ok with him coming back.
you've got to play the game sometimes.
So the City fans being interviewed weren't giving their honest opinions, but political answers for fear of rocking the boat? And the City fans applauding when Tevez left the pitch were in on this political plot as well? I know City fans well enough to know that they speak their minds no matter what, so I'm not having that for one minute. In my opinion, the majority of match going blues are a lot more pragmatic about Tevez than the majority of people on here. Strange one.