That W**ker from the guardian

[deJong_Ones]

honestly, my least favourite journalist in the world. The most anti-City **** i've ever come across, his Forest affiliation doesn't hide the Fergie shaped boner in his pants. Didn't he write a book about the rags? Basically, opinion pieces are one thing, but this guy writes every "news" article in the Guardian with a big slice of FUCK CITY on the side. He should be hounded out for the biased twat he is

(btw, i'd forgotten about this.. but when i opened my laptop this popped up and the rage was renewed)

 

[mrt4919]

Its Tuesday already, there will more rag loving media journalist distortions against us in the days to come.
Tevez first.
The depth of thier feeble attempts to destabilise us will highlight the manipulation behind the curtain of the evil empires long established contacts as they pull out all the stops for any advantage before the derby. All to be crowned by Uncle Alex the Red Faced clown damning us with feint praise on the Friday.
Conspiresy theory.....you bet but this one is nailed on and will unfold before your eyes in the days to come.
Thier days are numbered, it is the death rattle of a dying empire as thier Old Guard face a slaughter.

 

[Prestwich_Blue]

As I said recently, the infamous Joey Barton interview on GMR was done with the full knowledge and co-operation of Paul Tyrrell in order to stick the knife in Pearce.

I'd like to know the exact context of the Tevez interview. Was it recent and was it done with the knowledge of the City PR team? It does seem to be very recent and Lee Clayton, who wrote it, has been given some good access to senior City sources in the past (he did the first interview with Khaldoon very soon after the takeover). I would doubt he'd risk doing an unauthorised interview so if the PR team have been involved in this (which I assume they have) then there could be a number of possible reasons.

The first is to try to engender a "siege mentality" by getting some seemingly negative press. This is the sort of thing the rags usually do so well. The second could be to do with Mancini himself and his future.

 

[Blue Tooth]

The one and only reason that any of this shit is being written is that....


WE ARE NOW FEARED



Bring em on.

 

[Prestwich_Blue]

They've removed the comments section from Taylor's article. Reckon he must have been getting the worst of it.

 

[LongsightM13]

Daniel Taylor was shown to be a bare-faced liar and a very unprofessional journalist over the Jubilee allegation. Backtracking three times over such an inflammatory claim, and finally being shamed into admitting it was hearsay from a fourth-hand source would have gotten you run out of most decent newspapers once upon a time.
Ps, there's a Forest fan in my office and he absolutely hates City as well. What's their problem? Do they really think they're a club of similar stature to City? I know they won a couple of European cups, but even then they were only a mid-sized club — which, to be fair, made Clough's achievements all the more remarkable.

 

[Dass]

just came on to post this, here's the article: <a class="postlink" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2010/apr/13/carlos-tevez-criticises-roberto-mancini" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2010 ... to-mancini</a>

the junior Man U fanclub chairman Daniel Taylor is a completely biased prick.. i can't believe he has the front to write this article from the quotes available. I wish there was a comments section so i could rip him to shreds

Where the fuck did he get his quotes from, his mates down the pub? The knob writing the article says:

I did not transfer from United to City for the controversy

He didn't transfer from united. United never owned him. He transferred from his agent.