haha.... yeah. The Bad Company album sounded really good with a smoke. The David Crosby one sounded like a bad trip!We probably would have gotten to you first :). You’re an easy target; very sluggish after the 16 bong hits you took listening to Bad Company.
Can you be banned from a thread that hasn't even started yet.............? ;-)haha.... yeah. The Bad Company album sounded really good with a smoke. The David Crosby one sounded like a bad trip!
I don't mind taking a few hits to listen to some music...I'll volunteer for that. I'll have to set up a Go Fund Me page, though...
How are you on Kajagoogoo.Once again I will humbly point out that it’s not all subjective — there are certain elements of really great or really awful music that I believe can be commented on objectively :)
Ok I’ll start.Why? I want everybody to be able to review and comment and see everybody else comments.
It's not some exclusive club, I just suggested an interesting way of building up the nominators list, but like I've said, I'm all ears and things may change based on peoples feedback ..... which is the whole point of this "Week 0" phase.
I think those hairstyles are due a comeback.How are you on Kajagoogoo.
They never went away in my house ;-)I think those hairstyles are due a comeback.
Is that your objective opinion or are you already sporting one.I think those hairstyles are due a comeback.
My dog has one. Sadly I can’t quite generate the requisite volume of keratin.Is that your objective opinion or are you already sporting one.
Two words Beggs. Nick.How are you on Kajagoogoo.
Solar panels?My dog has one. Sadly I can’t quite generate the requisite volume of keratin.
First album for review then.Two words Beggs. Nick.
I rest my credentials.
Always had you down as more of a ‘Flock of Seagulls’ kind of guy.My dog has one. Sadly I can’t quite generate the requisite volume of keratin.
In my youth it was more Paul Weller when he had those long floppy front bangs, but I did briefly flirt with an ill-advised Bruce Foxton look. All photographic evidence of the latter was unfortunately consumed in a fire deemed “suspicious” by the authorities.Always had you down as more of a ‘Flock of Seagulls’ kind of guy.
Fucks sake. The politics sub section is more desirableIf we go "all inclusive", I might just pick you to start the ball rolling with The Smiths.
I find the back and forth over the Smiths here quite amusing. I believe I have not yet commented as to my perspective on this band. Soon I will no longer be able to keep mum on this topic so I very much encourage @RobMCFC to offer up Meat Is Murder or whatever so I can make my thoughts official . . . . .Fucks sake. The politics sub section is more desirable
I certainly won't be offering up The Smiths but if they do appear, I'll give them a fair hearing like everybody else.I find the back and forth over the Smiths here quite amusing. I believe I have not yet commented as to my perspective on this band. Soon I will no longer be able to keep mum on this topic so I very much encourage @RobMCFC to offer up Meat Is Murder or whatever so I can make my thoughts official . . . . .
Kajagoogoo received a lot of flak from scoop-hungry journalists usually because of the flamboyant fashion sense of Limahl and the rest of the band. Obviously, those critics did not really understand the songwriting and music-making process, which involve song structures, lyrics, instrumentation, arrangement, and all the other elements of music production. Because if they did, then they would have not been derogating Kajagoogoo as “all-looks, no talent.” Instead, they would have heard the complex beauty of its songs.First album for review then.
White Feathers.
Discuss.
Ok Mate, count me in thanks.I certainly won't be offering up The Smiths but if they do appear, I'll give them a fair hearing like everybody else.
Right, the people have spoken and everybody is officially invited to join in. If you want to nominate an album, let me know in here or drop me a PM but don't say what the album will be - we want some mystery and anticipation every week.
I'll probably publish an initial schedule and then each week add one more nominator so that people will always have enough time to prepare their statement or to ask for a date change if it clashes with something important in their life. I may yet kick off proceedings with my own entry so you can see the kind of format I'm after.
I've changed my mind back to scoring out of 10 as it's what people are familiar with and I've simplified the summary on page 1.
Any objections?
Makes sense. Probably a good reason for me to use the same scoring range as well (1-10).I guess any Album that appears and scored I will add to my league table and not review on the Top 1100 - Would seem silly to have it nominated/discussed twice.