cptaidan88
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 8 Dec 2008
- Messages
- 4,284
I agree but thats kind of the crux of their business plan.Whilst the odd City article every couple of days is good I find it hard to read any of the articles about other top 6 teams as they are so sycophantic and contain info only really relevant to supporters of those teams.
I’d much rather read football related articles about interesting nuances in other teams, the sort of stuff you don’t find elsewhere.
As for the rafa stuff, which is interesting, most of it has been paraphrased elsewhere anyway.
Not sure I’ll renew next year at this rate.
The journos they've poached were targeted because of their sources and reputations at particular clubs, and were hired so supporters of those clubs would subscribe to hear what they had to say. The journalists job is literally to only appeal to those supporters, and whilst they will try to appear balanced, there is no chance of Sam Lee criticising City in a way which would mean City fans would stop their subscription. Its the same with the Liverpool journo and their supporters etc.
So whilst its an improvement that articles are seemingly better researched and not written for click bait, its not quite balanced and objective journalism.
The Michael Cox articles have been good thus far, as he isn't reporting from a particular club point of view (although the subject of each article maybe be a particular club). I think its just a case of establishing which of the other journos are there to report from a general standpoint, rather than individually club focused.
I've probably only read one story every other day, so it wont be renewed next year unless that increases significantly.