The British Monarchy

He isn't he is someone who has a different opinion to you and feels no afinity to lizzie.

I respect his honesty over fake sorrow that many will be showing thinking it is necessary.

Plus his points are right a peado has been shielded by our royal family and a user of sex trafficked teenage girls is a member of it.

I want them abolished and have no reverence for our new king or his heir.

I do though have respect for the late queen for her time served in office, if she had died when I was that lads age my opinion would have been similar though to his and I would have been indiferent at that time.
By shielded do you mean having his titles stripped and fucked off from duties, whilst being told to speak to the FBI?
 
Was going to say if there was a vote tomorrow what do you think the population would vote for, abolish or keep, but i think it would unfairly sway towards keep at the mo.

So take 12 months ago, or even 2/3/4 years ago, what do you think the result would be?
Ive no idea, im sure there are polls though

Ive said this before, for whatever reason, the royals bring happiness to millions, lining the streets for a glimpse, ive no idea why. If they drove through my town id go see. Couldnt tell you why. But wherever they go they are met by smiling, cheering, happy faces. Bottle that and you make billions.

So just because you have the opinion they must go i reckon maybe 65+% want to keep. And i bet at this moment its way more

If they are bringing happiness to millions …. is that a bad thing ?
I suspect though don’t really know there will be a group of strong monarchists and a group of strong republicans. There will also be a large group of those like me that in neither camp but would lean towards a monarchy, if there was a vote I’d wouldn’t be worried either way it went. As for my vote I think without having thought too deeply about it the idea of more elections and campaigning and lobbyists for a head of state over a monarchy doesn’t appeal to me that much. I appreciate the pomp and ceremony and the history of it all even though I’m not all that interested personally.
 
Me when I played for Juventus:

HjFE8NKWuCmgfHCcndJ3rK-320-80.jpg
You could have just posted the photo. We knew the rest .
 
By shielded do you mean having his titles stripped and fucked off from duties, whilst being told to speak to the FBI?
Was he told to speak to them in person or in the safety of the palace and he still has his titles Prince and Duke of York and remains in the line of succession.

all that is changed is he is no longer a patron of organisations.
 
He speaks for myself. And statistically he's likely to speak for many others. He doesn't speak for yourself and other royalists, and that's fine.

But don't generalise and say he doesn't speak for Manchester, because it's patently untrue.
Statistically he speaks for a minority of people.

How’s it patently untrue to say he doesn’t speak for Manchester?

It’s obvious he doesn’t.

Every person I know in person, monarchists or not, liked the Queen and has been sad.

He called her “an evil coloniser” and accused her of shielding Andrew, both are blatant blatant lies.

She’s the opposite of a coloniser, the Empire ended under her reign and the Commonwealth replaced it.

She’s done loads for charity in former colonies around the world.
 
No. By shielded he means protected from any prosecution for his crimes because of his "royal blood".
How did she do that? How can she possibly protect him from prosecution in America?

She’s stripped him of everything and told him to speak to the FBI, that’s all she could do.
 
I suspect though don’t really know there will be a group of strong monarchists and a group of strong republicans. There will also be a large group of those like me that in neither camp but would lean towards a monarchy, if there was a vote I’d wouldn’t be worried either way it went. As for my vote I think without having thought too deeply about it the idea of more elections and campaigning and lobbyists for a head of state over a monarchy doesn’t appeal to me that much. I appreciate the pomp and ceremony and the history of it all even though I’m not all that interested personally.
Probably my view to be honest.

I just keep thinking, that they bringing happiness to untold thousands, millions! And if that is the majority, why change it? Why take away that happiness
 
Was going to say if there was a vote tomorrow what do you think the population would vote for, abolish or keep, but i think it would unfairly sway towards keep at the mo.

So take 12 months ago, or even 2/3/4 years ago, what do you think the result would be?
Ive no idea, im sure there are polls though

Ive said this before, for whatever reason, the royals bring happiness to millions, lining the streets for a glimpse, ive no idea why. If they drove through my town id go see. Couldnt tell you why. But wherever they go they are met by smiling, cheering, happy faces. Bottle that and you make billions.

So just because you have the opinion they must go i reckon maybe 65+% want to keep. And i bet at this moment its way more

If they are bringing happiness to millions …. is that a bad thing ?
I do believe a lot of the commonwealth will start to move away from Great Britain now the queen has passed . The Aussies will break away within 4 years I would imagine
 
Scruffy little **** doesn’t speak for Manchester
I suspect he will be speaking for many.
Andrew has heinous accusations against him and was shielded.
Charles is the subject of current allegations against him for offering peerages for cash.
There is more.
His outfit doesn't dress his brain.
I am Mancunian.
 
I do believe a lot of the commonwealth will start to move away from Great Britain now the queen has passed . The Aussies will break away within 4 years I would imagine
They will. In fact, Jamaica are another that have declared they want complete independence, no?

It won't happen in my lifetime, regrettably, but I pray my great-great grandchildren grow up in a thriving British Republic, unshackled from this ridiculous dependance on a form of rulership from the Middle Ages.
 
I suspect he will be speaking for many.
Andrew has heinous accusations against him and was shielded.
Charles is the subject of current allegations against him for offering peerages for cash.
There is more.
I am Mancunian.
There are a lot of idiots that will believe what this clown said but they’re still a small minority at population size.

Andrew hasn’t been shielded.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top