Manc baggie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 May 2018
- Messages
- 312
- Team supported
- West Brom
This is, unfortunately, not the case. I have posted below some passages from the ‘And what do you do?’ Book I have mentioned on this thread previously.I don’t think what they have has any bearing on my life, they have no power anymore the power lies with who we elect and allow to govern us. So the Royals won’t distract me by from what’s going on in Downing Street.
At no point in my history have I felt threatened by the Royals or their wealth. I’m ashamed of some of the choices our government made/make so I criticise anything I think could be done better eg: such as the WFP
Agitating for change is not a good thing when the few manage to overturn the many Johnson and Brexit, for eg:
The book gives a lot more detail on how the royals directly influence our government & therefore our lives.
The book was written when the queen was still alive, but the facts have now rolled onto the king & current prince of wales. The book is well worth a read.
Quotes below.
‘There are, however, two unelected individuals who, behind the scenes, have acquired the unique right to be consulted on, shape, and even block legislation that affects their private interests in a way they do not like.
Those individuals are the Queen and the Prince of Wales.
The precise mechanism is one called Queen's or Prince's Consent' and it was sought 146 times between 1970 and 2013. It remains very much alive today and, indeed, updated guidance on how it should operate was issued by the Office of the Parliamentary Counsel as recently as July 2015. It is the Counsel's role to decide if such Royal consent is needed for a bill. If the conclusion is that it is then Queen's Consent has to be obtained before a Bill can start its journey through the democratically elected Parliament.
It is therefore completely different from royal assent, which is the required rubber stamping by the monarch after a Bill has completed all its parliamentary stages.
Assent is uncontroversial. Consent is not.’